Troell Max, Naylor Rosamond L, Metian Marc, Beveridge Malcolm, Tyedmers Peter H, Folke Carl, Arrow Kenneth J, Barrett Scott, Crépin Anne-Sophie, Ehrlich Paul R, Gren Asa, Kautsky Nils, Levin Simon A, Nyborg Karine, Österblom Henrik, Polasky Stephen, Scheffer Marten, Walker Brian H, Xepapadeas Tasos, de Zeeuw Aart
Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;
Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111(37):13257-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404067111. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
Aquaculture is the fastest growing food sector and continues to expand alongside terrestrial crop and livestock production. Using portfolio theory as a conceptual framework, we explore how current interconnections between the aquaculture, crop, livestock, and fisheries sectors act as an impediment to, or an opportunity for, enhanced resilience in the global food system given increased resource scarcity and climate change. Aquaculture can potentially enhance resilience through improved resource use efficiencies and increased diversification of farmed species, locales of production, and feeding strategies. However, aquaculture's reliance on terrestrial crops and wild fish for feeds, its dependence on freshwater and land for culture sites, and its broad array of environmental impacts diminishes its ability to add resilience. Feeds for livestock and farmed fish that are fed rely largely on the same crops, although the fraction destined for aquaculture is presently small (∼4%). As demand for high-value fed aquaculture products grows, competition for these crops will also rise, as will the demand for wild fish as feed inputs. Many of these crops and forage fish are also consumed directly by humans and provide essential nutrition for low-income households. Their rising use in aquafeeds has the potential to increase price levels and volatility, worsening food insecurity among the most vulnerable populations. Although the diversification of global food production systems that includes aquaculture offers promise for enhanced resilience, such promise will not be realized if government policies fail to provide adequate incentives for resource efficiency, equity, and environmental protection.
水产养殖是增长最快的食品领域,并且继续与陆地作物和畜牧生产同步扩张。以投资组合理论作为概念框架,我们探讨了在资源稀缺加剧和气候变化的背景下,当前水产养殖、作物、畜牧和渔业部门之间的相互联系如何成为增强全球粮食系统恢复力的障碍或机遇。水产养殖有可能通过提高资源利用效率以及增加养殖物种、生产地点和投喂策略的多样性来增强恢复力。然而,水产养殖对陆地作物和野生鱼类作为饲料的依赖、对淡水和土地作为养殖场地的依赖以及其广泛的环境影响削弱了它增强恢复力的能力。用于喂养牲畜和养殖鱼类的饲料在很大程度上依赖相同的作物,尽管目前用于水产养殖的比例较小(约4%)。随着对高价值投喂型水产养殖产品需求的增长,对这些作物的竞争也会加剧,对野生鱼类作为饲料投入的需求也会增加。许多这些作物和饵料鱼也被人类直接食用,并为低收入家庭提供基本营养。它们在水产饲料中使用的增加有可能提高价格水平和波动性,加剧最脆弱人群的粮食不安全状况。尽管包括水产养殖在内的全球粮食生产系统的多样化为增强恢复力带来了希望,但如果政府政策未能为资源效率、公平和环境保护提供充分激励,这种希望将无法实现。