Chigira Yuusuke, Takai Tomoko, Oda Takahiro, Dobashi Kunio
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, Kanetsu Central Hospital, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1041-4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1041. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in effects caused by variation in the intervention frequency of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation, in terms of the pulmonary function, lower-limb muscle strength, exercise tolerance, and quality of life (QOL). [Subjects and Methods] A total of 36 patients with mild to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were studied. These patients were all men over the age of 40 who did not require assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Groups undergoing intervention once a month (M1 group) and once a week (W1 group) were compared in terms of the effects of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for a period of 12 weeks. Intervention during this time included supervised and home-based exercise. [Results] Comparison of before and after intervention revealed that the rate of change in the W1 group was significantly higher than that in the M1 group in terms of the QOL, lower-extremity muscle strength, and 6-minute walking distance. [Conclusion] Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs yielded greater improvements in the W1 group than in the M1 group in terms of the QOL and exercise tolerance.
[目的] 本研究旨在探讨门诊肺康复干预频率的变化在肺功能、下肢肌肉力量、运动耐力和生活质量(QOL)方面所产生的效果差异。[对象与方法] 共研究了36例轻至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。这些患者均为40岁以上的男性,日常生活活动(ADL)无需协助。比较每月接受一次干预的组(M1组)和每周接受一次干预的组(W1组),进行为期12周的门诊肺康复效果评估。在此期间的干预包括监督下的运动和居家运动。[结果] 干预前后的比较显示,在生活质量、下肢肌肉力量和6分钟步行距离方面,W1组的变化率显著高于M1组。[结论] 在生活质量和运动耐力方面,门诊肺康复计划在W1组比M1组产生了更大的改善。