Nagelhout Gera E, Wolfson Tanya, Zhuang Yue-Lin, Gamst Anthony, Willemsen Marc C, Zhu Shu-Hong
Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Alliance Smokefree Holland, The Hague, The Netherlands;
Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, SDSC, University of California, San Diego, CA;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Mar;17(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu162. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
Several states implemented comprehensive smoke-free laws in workplaces (14 states), restaurants (17 states), and bars (13 states) between 2002 and 2007. We tested the hypothesis that public support for smoke-free laws increases at a higher rate in states that implemented smoke-free laws between 2002 and 2007 (group A) than in states that implemented smoke-free laws after that time or not at all (group B). The period before the implementation (1992-2001) was also considered.
Data was used from the Current Population Survey (CPS) Tobacco Use Supplements (TUS), which is representative for the U.S. adult population. Respondents were asked whether they thought smoking should not be allowed in indoor work areas, restaurants, and bars and cocktail lounges. Differences in trends were analyzed with binomial mixed effects models.
Population support for smoke-free restaurants and bars was higher among group A than among group B before 2002. After 2002, support for smoke-free restaurants and bars increased at a higher rate among group A than among group B. Population support for smoke-free workplaces did not differ between group A and B, and the increase in support for smoke-free workplaces also did not differ between these groups.
The positive association between the implementation of smoke-free restaurant and bar laws and the rate of increase in support for these laws partly supported the hypothesis. The implementation of the laws may have caused support to increase, but also states that have higher support may have been more likely to implement smoke-free laws.
2002年至2007年间,有几个州在工作场所(14个州)、餐馆(17个州)和酒吧(13个州)实施了全面的无烟法律。我们检验了这样一个假设:在2002年至2007年间实施无烟法律的州(A组),公众对无烟法律的支持率增长速度高于在此之后实施无烟法律或根本未实施无烟法律的州(B组)。同时也考虑了实施前的时期(1992 - 2001年)。
使用了当前人口调查(CPS)烟草使用补充调查(TUS)的数据,该数据代表了美国成年人口。受访者被问及他们是否认为在室内工作区域、餐馆、酒吧和鸡尾酒廊不应允许吸烟。使用二项混合效应模型分析趋势差异。
2002年前,A组对无烟餐馆和酒吧的民众支持率高于B组。2002年后,A组对无烟餐馆和酒吧的支持率增长速度高于B组。A组和B组对无烟工作场所的民众支持率没有差异,两组对无烟工作场所支持率的增长也没有差异。
无烟餐馆和酒吧法律的实施与对这些法律支持率的增长之间的正相关关系部分支持了该假设。法律的实施可能促使支持率上升,但支持率较高的州也可能更有可能实施无烟法律。