Souza Danielle M, Teixeira Ricardo F M, Ostermann Ole P
Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP270, Ispra, I-21027, Italy; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lennart Hjelms väg, 9, Uppsala, Sweden.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jan;21(1):32-47. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12709. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, with land use and land-use change at the forefront of the drivers that provoke global and regional biodiversity loss. The first step in addressing the challenge of how to reverse the negative outlook for the coming years starts with measuring environmental loss rates and assigning responsibilities. Pinpointing the global pressures on biodiversity is a task best addressed using holistic models such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). LCA is the leading method for calculating cradle-to-grave environmental impacts of products and services; it is actively promoted by many public policies, and integrated as part of environmental information systems within private companies. LCA already deals with the potential biodiversity impacts of land use, but there are significant obstacles to overcome before its models grasp the full reach of the phenomena involved. In this review, we discuss some pressing issues that need to be addressed. LCA mainly introduces biodiversity as an endpoint category modeled as a loss in species richness due to the conversion and use of land over time and space. The functional and population effects on biodiversity are mostly absent due to the emphasis on species accumulation with limited geographic and taxonomical reach. Current land-use modeling activities that use biodiversity indicators tend to oversimplify the real dynamics and complexity of the interactions of species among each other and with their habitats. To identify the main areas for improvement, we systematically reviewed LCA studies on land use that had findings related to global change and conservation ecology. We provide suggestion as to how to address some of the issues raised. Our overall objective was to encourage companies to monitor and take concrete steps to address the impacts of land use on biodiversity on a broader geographical scale and along increasingly globalized supply chains.
生态系统正承受着来自人类活动日益增加的压力,土地利用和土地利用变化处于引发全球和区域生物多样性丧失的驱动因素的前沿。应对如何扭转未来几年负面前景这一挑战的第一步始于测量环境损失率并明确责任。确定对生物多样性的全球压力是一项最好使用诸如生命周期评估(LCA)等整体模型来解决的任务。LCA是计算产品和服务从摇篮到坟墓的环境影响的主要方法;它受到许多公共政策的积极推广,并作为私营公司环境信息系统的一部分被整合进来。LCA已经在处理土地利用对生物多样性的潜在影响,但在其模型全面掌握所涉及现象的范围之前,仍有重大障碍需要克服。在本综述中,我们讨论了一些需要解决的紧迫问题。LCA主要将生物多样性作为一个终点类别引入,该类别被建模为由于土地在时间和空间上的转换和使用导致的物种丰富度损失。由于强调物种积累且地理和分类范围有限,对生物多样性的功能和种群影响大多被忽略。目前使用生物多样性指标的土地利用建模活动往往过于简化了物种之间及其与栖息地相互作用的真实动态和复杂性。为了确定主要的改进领域,我们系统地回顾了关于土地利用的LCA研究,这些研究有与全球变化和保护生态学相关的发现。我们就如何解决所提出的一些问题提供了建议。我们的总体目标是鼓励公司在更广泛的地理范围内以及沿着日益全球化的供应链监测并采取具体措施来应对土地利用对生物多样性的影响。