Chu Xiakun, Wang Jin
College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China; State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China; State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China; Department of Chemistry and Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 21;10(8):e1003782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003782. eCollection 2014 Aug.
Flexibility in biomolecular recognition is essential and critical for many cellular activities. Flexible recognition often leads to moderate affinity but high specificity, in contradiction with the conventional wisdom that high affinity and high specificity are coupled. Furthermore, quantitative understanding of the role of flexibility in biomolecular recognition is still challenging. Here, we meet the challenge by quantifying the intrinsic biomolecular recognition energy landscapes with and without flexibility through the underlying density of states. We quantified the thermodynamic intrinsic specificity by the topography of the intrinsic binding energy landscape and the kinetic specificity by association rate. We found that the thermodynamic and kinetic specificity are strongly correlated. Furthermore, we found that flexibility decreases binding affinity on one hand, but increases binding specificity on the other hand, and the decreasing or increasing proportion of affinity and specificity are strongly correlated with the degree of flexibility. This shows more (less) flexibility leads to weaker (stronger) coupling between affinity and specificity. Our work provides a theoretical foundation and quantitative explanation of the previous qualitative studies on the relationship among flexibility, affinity and specificity. In addition, we found that the folding energy landscapes are more funneled with binding, indicating that binding helps folding during the recognition. Finally, we demonstrated that the whole binding-folding energy landscapes can be integrated by the rigid binding and isolated folding energy landscapes under weak flexibility. Our results provide a novel way to quantify the affinity and specificity in flexible biomolecular recognition.
生物分子识别中的灵活性对于许多细胞活动至关重要且关键。灵活识别通常导致中等亲和力但高特异性,这与高亲和力和高特异性相互关联的传统观念相矛盾。此外,对灵活性在生物分子识别中作用的定量理解仍然具有挑战性。在此,我们通过基于态密度来量化有无灵活性情况下的内在生物分子识别能量景观来应对这一挑战。我们通过内在结合能景观的地形来量化热力学内在特异性,并通过缔合速率来量化动力学特异性。我们发现热力学特异性和动力学特异性高度相关。此外,我们发现灵活性一方面降低结合亲和力,但另一方面增加结合特异性,并且亲和力和特异性的降低或增加比例与灵活性程度高度相关。这表明更多(更少)的灵活性导致亲和力和特异性之间的耦合更弱(更强)。我们的工作为先前关于灵活性、亲和力和特异性之间关系的定性研究提供了理论基础和定量解释。此外,我们发现折叠能量景观在结合时更呈漏斗状,表明在识别过程中结合有助于折叠。最后,我们证明了在弱灵活性下,整个结合 - 折叠能量景观可以由刚性结合和孤立折叠能量景观整合而成。我们的结果提供了一种量化灵活生物分子识别中亲和力和特异性的新方法。