Sommer Jurg M, Buyue Yang, Bardan Sara, Peters Robert T, Jiang Haiyan, Kamphaus George D, Gray Elaine, Pierce Glenn F
Jurg M. Sommer, PhD, Biogen Idec, 14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA, Tel: +1 617 914 6937, Fax: +1 888 693 8149, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2014 Nov;112(5):932-40. doi: 10.1160/TH13-11-0971. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Due to variability in the one-stage clotting assay, the performance of new factor IX (FIX) products should be assessed in this assay. The objective of this field study was to evaluate the accuracy of measuring recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity in clinical haemostasis laboratories using the one-stage clotting assay. Human haemophilic donor plasma was spiked with rFIXFc or BeneFIX® at 0.80, 0.20, or 0.05 IU/ml based on label potency. Laboratories tested blinded samples using their routine one-stage assay and in-house FIX plasma standard. The mean spike recoveries for BeneFIX (n=30 laboratories) were 121 %, 144 %, and 168 % of expected at nominal 0.80, 0.20, and 0.05 IU/ml concentrations, respectively. Corresponding rFIXFc spike recoveries were 88 %, 107 %, and 132 % of expected, respectively. All BeneFIX concentrations were consistently overestimated by most laboratories. rFIXFc activity was reagent-dependent; ellagic acid and silica gave higher values than kaolin, which underestimated rFIXFc. BeneFIX demonstrated significantly reduced chromogenic assay activity relative to one-stage assay results and nominal activity, while rFIXFc activity was close to nominal activity at three concentrations with better dilution linearity than the typical one-stage assay. In conclusion, laboratory- and reagent-specific assay variabilities were revealed, with progressively higher variability at lower FIX concentrations. Non-parallelism against the FIX plasma standard was observed in all one-stage assays with rFIXFc and BeneFIX, leading to significant overestimation of FIX activity at lower levels and generally high inter-laboratory variability. Compared to the accuracy currently achieved in clinical laboratories when measuring other rFIX products, most laboratories measured rFIXFc activity with acceptable accuracy and reliability using routine one-stage assay methods and commercially available plasma standards.
由于一期凝血试验存在变异性,新的凝血因子IX(FIX)产品的性能应在此试验中进行评估。本现场研究的目的是使用一期凝血试验评估临床止血实验室中测量重组FIX Fc融合蛋白(rFIXFc)活性的准确性。根据标签效价,在人血友病供体血浆中加入0.80、0.20或0.05 IU/ml的rFIXFc或贝赋®。各实验室使用其常规一期试验和内部FIX血浆标准品对盲法样本进行检测。贝赋(n = 30个实验室)在名义浓度为0.80、0.20和0.05 IU/ml时的平均加标回收率分别为预期值的121%、144%和168%。相应的rFIXFc加标回收率分别为预期值的88%、107%和132%。大多数实验室对所有贝赋浓度均持续高估。rFIXFc活性取决于试剂;鞣花酸和二氧化硅给出的值高于高岭土,高岭土会低估rFIXFc。相对于一期试验结果和名义活性,贝赋的发色底物法活性显著降低,而rFIXFc活性在三个浓度下接近名义活性,且稀释线性比典型的一期试验更好。总之,揭示了实验室和试剂特异性的试验变异性,在较低FIX浓度下变异性逐渐增加。在所有使用rFIXFc和贝赋的一期试验中均观察到与FIX血浆标准品的非平行性,导致在较低水平下FIX活性被显著高估,且实验室间变异性普遍较高。与目前临床实验室在测量其他rFIX产品时所达到的准确性相比,大多数实验室使用常规一期试验方法和市售血浆标准品测量rFIXFc活性时具有可接受的准确性和可靠性。