Suppr超能文献

使用末次月经来确定孕早期药物流产孕周的准确性:一项系统评价

The accuracy of using last menstrual period to determine gestational age for first trimester medication abortion: a systematic review.

作者信息

Schonberg Dana, Wang Lin-Fan, Bennett Ariana H, Gold Marji, Jackson Emily

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY.

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY.

出版信息

Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the accuracy of assessing gestational age (GA) prior to first trimester medication abortion using last menstrual period (LMP) compared to ultrasound (U/S).

STUDY DESIGN

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases through October 2013 for peer-reviewed articles comparing LMP to U/S for GA dating in abortion care. Two teams of investigators independently evaluated data using standard abstraction forms. The US Preventive Services Task Force and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guidelines were used to assess quality.

RESULTS

Of 318 articles identified, 5 met inclusion criteria. Three studies reported that 2.5-11.8% of women were eligible for medication abortion by LMP and ineligible by U/S. The number of women who underestimated GA using LMP compared to U/S ranged from 1.8 to 14.8%, with lower rates found when the sample was limited to a GA <63 days. Most women (90.5-99.1%) knew their LMP, 70.8-90.5% with certainty.

CONCLUSION

Our results support that LMP can be used to assess GA prior to medication abortion at GA <63 days. Further research looking at patient outcomes and identifying women eligible for medication abortion by LMP but ineligible by U/S is needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of providing medication abortion using LMP alone to determine GA.

摘要

目的

我们试图评估在孕早期药物流产前,使用末次月经日期(LMP)与超声(U/S)来评估孕周(GA)的准确性。

研究设计

我们检索了截至2013年10月的Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找比较LMP与U/S在流产护理中用于孕周确定的同行评审文章。两组研究人员使用标准摘要表格独立评估数据。采用美国预防服务工作组和诊断准确性研究质量评估指南来评估质量。

结果

在识别出的318篇文章中,5篇符合纳入标准。三项研究报告称,2.5 - 11.8%的女性按LMP符合药物流产条件,但按U/S不符合。与U/S相比,使用LMP低估GA的女性数量在1.8%至14.8%之间,当样本限于GA<63天时发现较低的比例。大多数女性(90.5 - 99.1%)知道自己的LMP,其中70.8 - 90.5%确定知道。

结论

我们的结果支持在GA<63天时,LMP可用于评估药物流产前 的GA。需要进一步研究观察患者结局,并识别出按LMP符合药物流产条件但按U/S不符合的女性,以确认仅使用LMP来确定GA进行药物流产的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验