Crichton Joanna, Hickman Matthew, Campbell Rona, Heron Jon, Horner Paddy, Macleod John
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e104943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104943. eCollection 2014.
Few estimates are available of chlamydia prevalence in the general population. Existing studies have limited scope to explore potential selection bias or associations with socioeconomic position.
We examined the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and associations with life-course socioeconomic position in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children in England. Chlamydia infection was measured through nucleic acid amplification test of urine specimens.
4864 (51%) of those invited attended the clinic (mean age 17.8; SD 0.37 years). (60%) provided a urine specimen. Prevalence was 1.0% (95% CI 0.6 to 1.6) among participants reporting sexual activity. Risk of infection was strongly associated with life course social disadvantage and with recent sexual behaviour. After adjustment for other measures of disadvantage and for sexual behaviour the strongest risk factors for infection were lower maternal educational attainment (OR 9.1 (1.1, 76.7)) and lower participant educational attainment at age 11 (OR 5.0 (1.5, 16.5)). Both clinic attendance and agreement to test were lower amongst the disadvantaged. Adjustment for selective participation based on detailed information on non-participants approximately doubled prevalence estimates. Prevalence was higher in sexually active women (1.4% (0.7 to 2.4) than men (0.5% (0.1 to 1.3)).
Chlamydia prevalence in this general population sample was low even after adjustment for selective participation in testing. These estimates of prevalence and patterns of association with socioeconomic position may both reflect recent screening efforts. Prevalence was higher amongst the disadvantaged who were also less likely to engage in testing. Our results reveal the importance of monitoring and addressing inequalities in screening programme participation and outcomes.
关于普通人群中衣原体感染率的估计很少。现有研究在探讨潜在选择偏倚或与社会经济地位的关联方面范围有限。
在英国埃文亲子纵向研究中,我们调查了沙眼衣原体感染率及其与生命历程社会经济地位的关联。通过对尿液样本进行核酸扩增试验来检测衣原体感染。
受邀者中有4864人(51%)前往诊所(平均年龄17.8岁;标准差0.37岁)。其中60%提供了尿液样本。报告有性行为的参与者中感染率为1.0%(95%置信区间0.6至1.6)。感染风险与生命历程中的社会劣势以及近期性行为密切相关。在对其他劣势指标和性行为进行调整后,感染的最强风险因素是母亲教育程度较低(比值比9.1(1.1,76.7))以及参与者11岁时教育程度较低(比值比5.0(1.5,16.5))。在弱势群体中,就诊率和同意检测率都较低。根据非参与者的详细信息对选择性参与进行调整后,感染率估计值大约翻了一番。有性行为的女性感染率(1.4%(0.7至2.4))高于男性(0.5%(0.1至1.3))。
即使对检测的选择性参与进行调整后,该普通人群样本中的衣原体感染率仍较低。这些感染率估计值以及与社会经济地位的关联模式可能都反映了近期的筛查努力。弱势群体中的感染率较高,而他们参与检测的可能性也较小。我们的结果揭示了监测和解决筛查项目参与及结果方面不平等现象的重要性。