Huang Wei, Mamat Marhaba, Shang Rui, Zhang Tianyang, Li Hao, Wang Yao, Luo Wei, Wu Yanhong
1 Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Aug;115(1):179-98. doi: 10.2466/07.17.21.PR0.115c12z9. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
Differences in the concepts of private, collective, and relational selves between two Chinese ethnic groups, the Han and Tibetan-adhering to the philosophies of Confucianism and Tibetan Buddhism, respectively-were examined. 128 students (54 men, 74 women; M age = 20.9 yr., SD = 2.2) completed the revised Twenty Statements Test and self-reference paradigm. Study 1 found that for Han participants relational and private selves were ranked similarly and as more important than the collective self. Studies 2 and 3 found that adjective words describing private and relational selves were recalled in greater proportions than words describing the collective self. Tibetan participants showed no significant differences between the three self-cognitions. The findings correspond to differences in self-identity among these two subcultures.
研究考察了分别秉持儒家思想和藏传佛教的两个中国民族——汉族和藏族——在个人自我、集体自我和关系自我概念上的差异。128名学生(54名男性,74名女性;平均年龄=20.9岁,标准差=2.2)完成了修订后的二十陈述测验和自我参照范式。研究1发现,汉族参与者的关系自我和个人自我排名相似,且比集体自我更重要。研究2和3发现,描述个人自我和关系自我的形容词被回忆起的比例高于描述集体自我的形容词。藏族参与者在这三种自我认知之间没有显著差异。这些发现与这两个亚文化群体在自我认同上的差异相一致。