• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知觉匹配中的自我层次结构:不同加工阶段的变化

Self-Hierarchy in Perceptual Matching: Variations in Different Processing Stages.

作者信息

Zheng Yingcan, Xiao Zilun, Liu Yong, Zhou Xin

机构信息

Developmental Psychology for Armyman, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 6;13:770604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.770604. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.770604
PMID:35465530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9019470/
Abstract

People have three cognitive representations of the self, namely, the individual, relational, and collective selves (CS), which are indispensable components of selfhood but not necessarily given equal preference. Previous studies found that people displayed varied self-hierarchy in miscellaneous tasks involving different research materials that had pre-existing learned associations established over long periods of time. Therefore, this study tries to explore a purer self-hierarchy without the influence of research materials, using perceptual matching tasks. The behavioral and event-related potentials' (ERPs) findings showed that people recognized information association with their individual self (IS) faster compared with their relational (RS) and CS. Smaller N2, stronger P3 and late positive complex (LPC) amplitudes were evoked during IS compared with RS and CS. However, the three selves evoked equal P2 amplitudes at the early processing stage. Moreover, CS showed a weaker advantage than RS, demonstrating a longer reaction time, lower d prime, and weaker P3 and LPC amplitudes in the parietal region. Overall, self-hierarchy during simple perceptual processing manifested as IS > RS > CS at the late processing stage but manifested as IS = RS = CS at the early processing stage. Self-hierarchy varies according to the processing stage, even without meaningful information and during the simple perception processing. This result provides direct evidence that all selves can be tagged with neutral actions, which would fit the idea of an organism attuned to self-survival at multiple processing levels.

摘要

人们对自我有三种认知表征,即个体自我、关系自我和集体自我(CS),它们是自我的不可或缺的组成部分,但不一定受到同等程度的重视。先前的研究发现,在涉及经过长时间建立起预先存在的学习关联的不同研究材料的各种任务中,人们表现出不同的自我层次结构。因此,本研究试图使用感知匹配任务来探索一种不受研究材料影响的更纯粹的自我层次结构。行为和事件相关电位(ERP)的研究结果表明,与关系自我(RS)和集体自我相比,人们识别与个体自我(IS)相关的信息更快。与RS和CS相比,在处理个体自我时诱发的N2波更小,P3波和晚期正复合波(LPC)的波幅更强。然而,在早期处理阶段,三种自我诱发的P2波幅相等。此外,集体自我比关系自我表现出更弱的优势,表现为反应时间更长、d'值更低,以及顶叶区域的P3波和LPC波幅更弱。总体而言,在简单感知处理过程中的自我层次结构在后期处理阶段表现为个体自我>关系自我>集体自我,但在早期处理阶段表现为个体自我=关系自我=集体自我。即使在没有有意义信息的情况下以及在简单感知处理过程中,自我层次结构也会根据处理阶段而变化。这一结果提供了直接证据,表明所有自我都可以用中性行为来标记,这符合生物体在多个处理层面上适应自我生存的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/ebf0de59467b/fpsyg-13-770604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/4df7febad46b/fpsyg-13-770604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/a7e80c9e6b09/fpsyg-13-770604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/ebf0de59467b/fpsyg-13-770604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/4df7febad46b/fpsyg-13-770604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/a7e80c9e6b09/fpsyg-13-770604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbd/9019470/ebf0de59467b/fpsyg-13-770604-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Hierarchy in Perceptual Matching: Variations in Different Processing Stages.知觉匹配中的自我层次结构:不同加工阶段的变化
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 6;13:770604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.770604. eCollection 2022.
2
The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Relational-Self and the Collective-Self During Attention Processing.注意力加工过程中关系自我与集体自我之间的层次关系
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Mar 5;15:557-567. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S349074. eCollection 2022.
3
Collective self-referential processing evoked by different national symbols: An event-related potential study.不同国家符号引发的集体自我参照加工:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2022 Mar 16;773:136496. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136496. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
The primacy of the individual versus the collective self: evidence from an event-related potential study.个体相对于集体自我的首要性:来自事件相关电位研究的证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Feb 22;535:30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.061. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
5
Individual self > relational self > collective self-But why? Processes driving the self-hierarchy in self- and person perception.个体自我>关系自我>集体自我——但为什么呢?驱动自我和人际感知中自我层级的过程。
J Pers. 2019 Apr;87(2):212-230. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12384. Epub 2018 May 6.
6
The effect of trait anxiety on the time course of self-relevant processing: Evidence from the perceptual matching task.特质焦虑对自我相关加工时程的影响:来自知觉匹配任务的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2023 Mar;178:108529. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108529. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
Temporal features of individual and collective self-referential processing: an event-related potential study.个体和集体自我参照加工的时间特征:一项事件相关电位研究。
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 9;8:e8917. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8917. eCollection 2020.
8
Visuospatial information processing load and the ratio between parietal cue and target P3 amplitudes in the Attentional Network Test.注意力网络测试中的视觉空间信息处理负荷以及顶叶线索与目标P3波幅之间的比率。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Apr 24;647:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Motivational Hierarchy in the Chinese Brain: Primacy of the Individual Self, Relational Self, or Collective Self?中国人大脑中的动机层次结构:个体自我、关系自我还是集体自我占主导地位?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 13;7:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00877. eCollection 2016.
10
Processing of global and local properties--an analysis with event-related brain potentials.全局和局部属性的处理——一项基于事件相关脑电位的分析
Sci China C Life Sci. 1996 Apr;39(2):179-88.

本文引用的文献

1
The Self-Prioritization Effect: Self-referential processing in movement highlights modulation at multiple stages.自我优先效应:运动中的自我参照加工突出了多个阶段的调制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2656-2674. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02295-0. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Through the looking glass: Distinguishing neural correlates of relational and non-relational self-reference and person representation.透过镜子:区分关系性与非关系性自我参照及人物表征的神经关联
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:257-274. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
Attentional saliency and ingroup biases: From society to the brain.
注意突显和内群体偏见:从社会到大脑。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Jun;15(3):324-333. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2020.1716070. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
The effect of emotional information from eyes on empathy for pain: A subliminal ERP study.眼睛传达的情绪信息对疼痛共情的影响:一项阈下 ERP 研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226211. eCollection 2019.
5
Positive representation of relational self-esteem versus personal self-esteem in Chinese with interdependent self-construal.具有互依型自我构念的中国人更倾向于积极呈现关系自尊而非个人自尊。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Nov;134:107195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107195. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
The Neural Representation of Relational- and Collective-Self: Two Forms of Collectivism.关系自我与集体自我的神经表征:两种集体主义形式
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 19;9:2624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02624. eCollection 2018.
7
Individual self > relational self > collective self-But why? Processes driving the self-hierarchy in self- and person perception.个体自我>关系自我>集体自我——但为什么呢?驱动自我和人际感知中自我层级的过程。
J Pers. 2019 Apr;87(2):212-230. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12384. Epub 2018 May 6.
8
In-group biases and oculomotor responses: beyond simple approach motivation.内群体偏见与眼球运动反应:超越简单的趋近动机
Exp Brain Res. 2018 May;236(5):1347-1355. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5221-7. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
I before U: Temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects.I在U之前:时间顺序判断揭示了对自有物品的偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):589-598. doi: 10.1177/1747021818762010. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: Evidence for a shared representation.感知匹配中的自我和团队优先级效应:共享表征的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:107-118. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 20.