Thagard Paul, Stewart Terrence C
Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Nov;30:73-90. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
Consciousness results from three mechanisms: representation by firing patterns in neural populations, binding of representations into more complex representations called semantic pointers, and competition among semantic pointers to capture the most important aspects of an organism's current state. We contrast the semantic pointer competition (SPC) theory of consciousness with the hypothesis that consciousness is the capacity of a system to integrate information (IIT). We describe computer simulations to show that SPC surpasses IIT in providing better explanations of key aspects of consciousness: qualitative features, onset and cessation, shifts in experiences, differences in kinds across different organisms, unity and diversity, and storage and retrieval.
神经群体中放电模式的表征、将表征绑定为称为语义指针的更复杂表征,以及语义指针之间的竞争以捕捉生物体当前状态的最重要方面。我们将意识的语义指针竞争(SPC)理论与意识是系统整合信息(IIT)的能力这一假设进行了对比。我们描述了计算机模拟,以表明SPC在对意识的关键方面提供更好的解释方面超越了IIT:定性特征、开始和停止、体验的转变、不同生物体之间种类的差异、统一性和多样性,以及存储和检索。