Suppr超能文献

使用吡格列酮、罗格列酮或二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病医疗补助患者中心力衰竭的发展。

Development of heart failure in Medicaid patients with type 2 diabetes treated with pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, or metformin.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch St., 12th Fl., Rm. 01-204, Baltimore, MD 21201.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):895-903. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.895.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicaid covers a high-risk population typically underrepresented in clinical trial data and largely absent in observational studies of real-world cardiovascular risks associated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, which are used to manage type 2 diabetes. In November 2013, the FDA removed prescribing restrictions for rosiglitazone in light of new evidence that rosiglitazone did not increase the risk of heart attack compared with standard type 2 diabetes medications. Further investigation is needed to elucidate whether the risk of heart failure (HF) associated with TZDs may be exacerbated in the Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative risk of incident HF in patients initiating rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and metformin therapy in a Medicaid population.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined claims data for patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in Maryland State Medicaid and managed care or fee-for-service programs between July 2005 and June 2010. Patients initiated on metformin, pioglitazone, or rosiglitazone treatments were extracted for analysis. Relative risks of incident HF after initiating treatment were compared using survival analysis, adjusting for switching or adding antidiabetic therapies during follow-up and other baseline risk factors for HF.

RESULTS

Of 6,271 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 88% were started on metformin; 7% were started on pioglitazone; and 5% were started on rosiglitazone. Patients who initiated rosiglitazone had higher risk of HF than patients who initiated metformin using either univariate (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.37-2.39), multivariate (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.15-2.15), or propensity score-matched (HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.16-2.76) analysis. There was no significant difference in risk between patients who initiated pioglitazone and metformin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with metformin, there may be higher risk of developing HF in Medicaid patients started on rosiglitazone but not pioglitazone. While pioglitazone was associated with a lower risk of developing HF compared with rosiglitazone, health care professionals should continue to work closely with their patients to determine the treatment options most appropriate.

摘要

背景

医疗补助计划涵盖了高危人群,这些人群在临床试验数据中代表性不足,在观察性研究中也基本不存在,这些研究涉及噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZD)与真实世界心血管风险的关联,如吡格列酮和罗格列酮,这些药物用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。2013 年 11 月,鉴于新证据表明罗格列酮不会增加心脏病发作的风险,与标准的 2 型糖尿病药物相比,FDA 取消了罗格列酮的处方限制。需要进一步调查,以阐明噻唑烷二酮类药物相关的心力衰竭(HF)风险是否会在医疗补助人群中加剧。

目的

在医疗补助人群中,确定开始使用罗格列酮、吡格列酮和二甲双胍治疗的患者发生 HF 的相对风险。

方法

我们回顾性地检查了 2005 年 7 月至 2010 年 6 月期间在马里兰州州医疗补助计划和管理式医疗或按服务收费计划中登记的 2 型糖尿病患者的索赔数据。提取开始接受二甲双胍、吡格列酮或罗格列酮治疗的患者进行分析。使用生存分析比较开始治疗后发生 HF 的相对风险,同时调整了随访期间切换或添加抗糖尿病治疗的情况以及 HF 的其他基线风险因素。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 6271 名患者中,88%的患者开始使用二甲双胍;7%的患者开始使用吡格列酮;5%的患者开始使用罗格列酮。使用单变量(HR=1.81,95%CI=1.37-2.39)、多变量(HR=1.57,95%CI=1.15-2.15)或倾向评分匹配(HR=1.79,95%CI=1.16-2.76)分析,与开始使用二甲双胍的患者相比,开始使用罗格列酮的患者发生 HF 的风险更高。开始使用吡格列酮的患者与开始使用二甲双胍的患者相比,HF 风险无显著差异。

结论

与二甲双胍相比,开始使用罗格列酮的医疗补助患者发生 HF 的风险可能更高,但开始使用吡格列酮的患者则不然。虽然吡格列酮与罗格列酮相比发生 HF 的风险较低,但医疗保健专业人员应继续与患者密切合作,以确定最适合的治疗方案。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
The Search for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Pulmonary Hypertension.肺动脉高压中疾病修饰疗法的探索。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;24(4):334-354. doi: 10.1177/1074248419829172. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验