• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Estimate of the cost/benefit ratio of measles vaccination].

作者信息

Cárdenas Ayala V M, Ruiz Matus C, Cabrera Coello L, Montesano Castellanos R, Garrido Lozada M T, Olvera Castillo R, Díaz Ortega J L

出版信息

Salud Publica Mex. 1989 Nov-Dec;31(6):735-44.

PMID:2516660
Abstract

Among primary health care programs, one of those that has the highest benefit/cost ratio is measles immunization. An estimate of cases, complicated cases and deaths that could have occurred if such immunization program would not have been run, and costs of medical care (hospitalization, physician's visits, medical treatment and rehabilitation), were calculated. Since population at risk has a steady-state given by those who enter -births- and releave it -when they are 15 years old-, if the program did not exist more than 2 million cases and at least 60,000 deaths from measles would have occurred annually. This hypothetical situation is compared with the actual situation of measles in Mexico during the 80's; 1) no more than 100,000 cases could have been estimated to occur in the very extreme case of notifying only one out of 10 cases. 2) The proportions of vaccinated and immune children under five reach 70 percent; this situation has produced 3) a fade out of epidemicity and has increased the critical size of community population for epidemics and doubled the interepidemic interval with the corollary of 4) increasing the average age of infection. The average cost of vaccinating a child was estimated near 1.25 dollars (US). Estimated costs of disease are related to individual losses. Taking into account these factors, benefit/cost ratio of measles immunization in Mexico is, at least, 100:1. Measles transmission patterns in Mexico are discussed since they lead to increase the benefit/cost ratio as compared to countries where the age of infection was put up before the immunization era. To expand investments on measles immunization is recommended.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Estimate of the cost/benefit ratio of measles vaccination].
Salud Publica Mex. 1989 Nov-Dec;31(6):735-44.
2
Measles epidemiology and outbreak response immunization in a rural community in Peru.秘鲁一个农村社区的麻疹流行病学及疫情应对免疫情况
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(7):545-52.
3
Measles control in developing and developed countries: the case for a two-dose policy.发展中国家和发达国家的麻疹控制:两剂次政策的情况
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(1):93-103.
4
[Costs and benefits of measles vaccination].[麻疹疫苗接种的成本与效益]
Fortschr Med. 1978 Feb 23;96(8):409-14.
5
An economic analysis of the current universal 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccination program in the United States.美国当前普遍实施的两剂次麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗接种计划的经济分析。
J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S131-45. doi: 10.1086/378987.
6
Establishing the health and economic impact of influenza vaccination within the European Union 25 countries.确定流感疫苗接种在欧盟25个国家内对健康和经济的影响。
Vaccine. 2006 Nov 17;24(47-48):6812-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.07.042. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
7
Cost-effectiveness and potential impact of rotavirus vaccination in the United States.美国轮状病毒疫苗接种的成本效益及潜在影响
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):684-97. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2876.
8
Economic burden of varicella in Singapore--a cost benefit estimate of implementation of a routine varicella vaccination.新加坡水痘的经济负担——常规水痘疫苗接种实施的成本效益估计
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Sep;35(3):693-6.
9
A benefit-cost analysis of a childhood varicella vaccination programme.一项儿童水痘疫苗接种计划的成本效益分析。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 4:17-22.
10
Economic evaluation of the 7-vaccine routine childhood immunization schedule in the United States, 2001.2001年美国7种儿童常规免疫接种疫苗时间表的经济学评估
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1136-44. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1136.