Suppr超能文献

韩国早期胃癌患者手术治疗与内镜下黏膜下剥离术的成本比较。

Cost comparison between surgical treatments and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer in Korea.

作者信息

Kim Younhee, Kim Young Woo, Choi Il Ju, Cho Joo Young, Kim Jong Hee, Kwon Jin Won, Lee Ja Youn, Lee Na Rae, Seol Sang Yong

机构信息

National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2015 Mar;9(2):174-80. doi: 10.5009/gnl13299.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate whether medical costs can be reduced using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) instead of conventional surger-ies in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS

Pa-tients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and ESD for EGC were recruited from three medical institutions in 2009. For macro-costing, the medical costs for each patient were derived from the ex-penses incurred during the patient's hospital stay and 1-year follow-up. The overall costs in micro-costing were determined by multiplying the unit cost with the resources used during the patients' hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The hospital stay for ESD was 5 to 8 days and was significantly shorter than the 12-day hospital stay for OG or the 11- to 17-day stay for LAG. Using macro-costing, the average medical costs for ESD during the hospital stay ranged from 2.1 to 3.4 million Korean Won (KRW) per patient, and the medical costs for conventional surgeries were estimated to be between 5.1 million and 8.2 million KRW. There were no significant differences in the 1-year follow-up costs between ESD and conventional surger-ies.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD patients had lower medical costs than those patients who had conventional surgeries for EGC with conservative indications. (Gut Liver, 2015;9174-180).

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估对于早期胃癌(EGC)患者,使用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)而非传统手术是否能够降低医疗成本。

方法

2009年从三家医疗机构招募了接受开放胃切除术(OG)、腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LAG)以及ESD治疗EGC的患者。对于宏观成本核算,每位患者的医疗成本来自患者住院期间及1年随访所产生的费用。微观成本核算中的总成本是通过将单位成本与患者住院期间使用的资源相乘来确定的。

结果

本研究共纳入194例患者。ESD的住院时间为5至8天,明显短于OG的12天住院时间或LAG的11至17天住院时间。采用宏观成本核算,ESD患者住院期间的平均医疗成本为每位患者210万至340万韩元(KRW),传统手术的医疗成本估计在510万至820万KRW之间。ESD与传统手术在1年随访成本方面无显著差异。

结论

对于具有保守适应症的EGC患者,接受ESD治疗的患者医疗成本低于接受传统手术的患者。(《胃肠肝脏病学》,2015;9:174 - 180)

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
The Primary Process and Key Concepts of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare.医疗保健中的初级过程和经济评估的关键概念。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Sep;55(5):415-423. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.195. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8

本文引用的文献

3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.早期胃癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Gut Liver. 2011 Dec;5(4):418-26. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.4.418. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌的内镜治疗。
J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Sep;11(3):146-54. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.3.146. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
6

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验