• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无效气道清除临床指标准确性的系统评价与Meta分析

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of clinical indicators for ineffective airway clearance.

作者信息

de Sousa Vanessa Emille Carvalho, Lopes Marcos Venícios de Oliveira, da Silva Viviane Martins

机构信息

Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2015 Mar;71(3):498-513. doi: 10.1111/jan.12518. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1111/jan.12518
PMID:25169072
Abstract

AIM

To report quantitative evidence for the accuracy of the defining characteristics of ineffective airway clearance in different settings and populations.

BACKGROUND

Defining characteristics are tests used by nurses to clinically indicate the presence or absence of a particular nursing diagnosis. A few studies have reported the accuracy of certain defining characteristics of ineffective airway clearance, but these studies address specific populations with particular needs.

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to provide a synthesis and critical appraisal of the included studies.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and LILACS were searched using a systematic search strategy for studies published in any year. The last search was performed on 31 July 2013.

REVIEW METHODS

Using the recommendations from Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD), a systematic review was conducted using studies investigating the presence of ineffective airway clearance and its defining characteristics. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Seven papers met the search criteria. The studies were developed in different clinical settings and most of them fulfilled QUADAS criteria. Summary measures indicated the following defining characteristics with higher accuracy values: adventitious breath sounds, changes in respiratory rate, difficult vocalizing, diminished breath sounds, dyspnoea, ineffective cough, orthopnoea and restlessness.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed that the variability in clinical indicators of ineffective airway clearance is related to differences in the clinical settings and patients.

摘要

目的

报告不同环境和人群中无效气道清除定义特征准确性的定量证据。

背景

定义特征是护士用于临床指示特定护理诊断存在与否的测试。一些研究报告了无效气道清除某些定义特征的准确性,但这些研究针对的是有特定需求的特定人群。

设计

进行了一项系统评价并荟萃分析,以对纳入研究进行综合和批判性评价。

数据来源

使用系统检索策略对电子数据库CINAHL、PubMed、Scopus和LILACS进行检索,以查找任何年份发表的研究。最后一次检索于2013年7月31日进行。

综述方法

根据Cochrane协作网关于诊断测试准确性系统评价的建议和诊断准确性报告标准(STARD),使用调查无效气道清除及其定义特征存在情况的研究进行系统评价。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)工具评估研究质量。

结果

七篇论文符合检索标准。这些研究在不同临床环境中开展,且大多数符合QUADAS标准。汇总指标显示以下定义特征具有较高的准确性值:异常呼吸音、呼吸频率变化、发声困难、呼吸音减弱(呼吸音减低)、呼吸困难、无效咳嗽、端坐呼吸和烦躁不安。

结论

本系统评价表明,无效气道清除临床指标的变异性与临床环境和患者的差异有关。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of clinical indicators for ineffective airway clearance.无效气道清除临床指标准确性的系统评价与Meta分析
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Mar;71(3):498-513. doi: 10.1111/jan.12518. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Regional cerebral blood flow single photon emission computed tomography for detection of Frontotemporal dementia in people with suspected dementia.用于检测疑似痴呆患者额颞叶痴呆的局部脑血流单光子发射计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD010896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010896.pub2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则,以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
7
Symptom- and chest-radiography screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative adults and adults with unknown HIV status.症状和胸部 X 线筛查在 HIV 阴性的成年人和 HIV 状态未知的成年人中的活动性肺结核。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 23;3(3):CD010890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010890.pub2.
8
Interventions for bronchiectasis: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.支气管扩张症的干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD010337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010337.pub2.
9
Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis.用于囊性纤维化患者气道清理的振荡装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD006842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006842.pub4.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary international expert consensus on perioperative airway management.围手术期气道管理的多学科国际专家共识
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):1042-1060. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-273. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Clinical validation of nursing diagnosis "00085 Impaired Physical Mobility" in multiple traumas victims.多处创伤患者护理诊断“00085 身体活动障碍”的临床验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Oct 28;27:e3190. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2859.3190. eCollection 2019.