Sayegh Eli T, Fakurnejad Shayan, Oh Taemin, Bloch Orin, Parsa Andrew T
Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1139-47. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132829. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
Patients who undergo craniotomy for brain tumor resection are prone to experiencing seizures, which can have debilitating medical, neurological, and psychosocial effects. A controversial issue in neurosurgery is the common practice of administering perioperative anticonvulsant prophylaxis to these patients despite a paucity of supporting data in the literature. The foreseeable benefits of this strategy must be balanced against potential adverse effects and interactions with critical medications such as chemotherapeutic agents and corticosteroids. Multiple disparate metaanalyses have been published on this topic but have not been applied into clinical practice, and, instead, personal preference frequently determines practice patterns in this area of management. Therefore, to select the current best available evidence to guide clinical decision making, the literature was evaluated to identify meta-analyses that investigated the efficacy and/or safety of anticonvulsant prophylaxis in this patient population. Six meta-analyses published between 1996 and 2011 were included in the present study. The Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses and Oxman-Guyatt methodological quality assessment tools were used to score these meta-analyses, and the Jadad decision algorithm was applied to determine the highest-quality meta-analysis. According to this analysis, 2 metaanalyses were deemed to be the current best available evidence, both of which conclude that prophylactic treatment does not improve seizure control in these patients. Therefore, this management strategy should not be routinely used.
接受开颅手术切除脑肿瘤的患者容易发生癫痫发作,这可能会产生使人衰弱的医学、神经学和心理社会影响。神经外科领域一个有争议的问题是,尽管文献中支持数据匮乏,但对这些患者围手术期给予抗惊厥药物预防性治疗仍是常见做法。这种策略可预见的益处必须与潜在的不良反应以及与化疗药物和皮质类固醇等关键药物的相互作用相权衡。关于这个主题已经发表了多项不同的荟萃分析,但尚未应用于临床实践,相反,个人偏好常常决定了这一管理领域的实践模式。因此,为了选择当前最佳可用证据来指导临床决策,对文献进行了评估,以确定调查该患者群体抗惊厥药物预防性治疗疗效和/或安全性的荟萃分析。本研究纳入了1996年至2011年间发表的六项荟萃分析。使用荟萃分析报告质量工具和奥克斯曼-盖亚特方法学质量评估工具对这些荟萃分析进行评分,并应用贾达德决策算法确定质量最高的荟萃分析。根据该分析,两项荟萃分析被认为是当前最佳可用证据,两者均得出预防性治疗不能改善这些患者癫痫控制的结论。因此,这种管理策略不应常规使用。