Murphy D J, Manbeck H B
J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Jul;20(3):199-210.
A mail survey of 1,200 farms across 16 states was conducted to identify the number, type, and size of manure storages per farm, as well as safety-related behaviors or actions related to entry into confined-space manure storage and handling facilities. Respondents provided data on 297 storage units and facilities, with approximately 75% reporting up to three storages per farm operation. Dimensions were provided for 254 manure pits: nearly 66% were less than or equal to 100 feet long, 75% were less than or equal to 40 feet wide, and 75% were less than or equal to 10 feet deep. Almost 14% of the reported storages were over 300 feet long, seven were wider than 100 feet, and 17 were more than 20 feet deep. Survey results suggest that most farm operations with confined-space manure storages do not follow best safety practices regarding their manure storages, including using gas detection equipment before entering a manure pit, using rescue lines when entering storages, or developing a written confined-space safety policy or plan. Survey results also suggest that few farmers post warning signs around their storages, post recommended ventilation times before entry, or conduct training for workers who enter confined-space manure storages. This article provides a benchmark against which the effectiveness of educational programs and design tools for confined-space manure pit ventilation systems and other confined-space manure pit safety interventions can be measured.
对16个州的1200个农场进行了邮件调查,以确定每个农场粪便储存设施的数量、类型和规模,以及与进入密闭空间粪便储存和处理设施相关的安全行为或行动。受访者提供了297个储存单元和设施的数据,约75%的受访者表示每个农场运营有多达三个储存设施。提供了254个粪坑的尺寸:近66%的粪坑长度小于或等于100英尺,75%的粪坑宽度小于或等于40英尺,75%的粪坑深度小于或等于10英尺。报告的储存设施中,近14%的长度超过300英尺,7个宽度超过100英尺,17个深度超过20英尺。调查结果表明,大多数有密闭空间粪便储存设施的农场运营在粪便储存方面未遵循最佳安全做法,包括进入粪坑前使用气体检测设备、进入储存设施时使用救援绳,或制定书面的密闭空间安全政策或计划。调查结果还表明,很少有农民在其储存设施周围张贴警示标志、张贴进入前建议的通风时间,或对进入密闭空间粪便储存设施的工人进行培训。本文提供了一个基准,据此可以衡量针对密闭空间粪坑通风系统及其他密闭空间粪坑安全干预措施的教育项目和设计工具的有效性。