Beswick-Honn Jessica M, Peters Thomas M, Anthony T Renée
University of Iowa.
J Agric Saf Health. 2017 Nov 20;23(4):265-279. doi: 10.13031/jash.12530.
Direct-reading gas monitors warn workers of the risk of potentially fatal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) exposures that may arise during manure handling. Low-cost, low-maintenance H2S monitors are available from many manufacturers, but differences in their features and performance make selection challenging for farmers. Moreover, little information is available on the practical maintenance and performance of these devices in agricultural environments. The objective of this study was to provide information to agricultural workers to aid in the selection, maintenance, and use of low-cost H2S monitors. This laboratory study evaluated the performance of several low-cost monitors over a simulated period of use of one year in a swine barn. Four models were exposed to H2S concentrations of 1 to 10 ppm over 18 weeks to examine the drift in reported concentration and changes in the alarm reaction time. Over the simulated barn year, the performance of alarm-only monitors declined faster than that of monitors displaying the H2S concentration. Of concern was the high-level (20 ppm) alarm failures after an equivalent of 139 days (Altair) and 289 days (BW Clip) in a swine barn, well within the monitor's reported shelf-life. Models displaying concentration exhibited fewer failures but were inaccurate in the displayed concentration when challenged with 20 ppm of H2S. The T40 Rattler provided consistently higher readings (+2.3 ppm), and the Pac 3500 showed consistently lower readings (-3.4 ppm) when challenged with 20 ppm. This study confirms the need for routine bump tests for these low-cost monitors to ensure that the monitor reacts to the presence of H2S, even if the manufacturer does not recommend this procedure. Most importantly, agricultural workers should inspect and bump test these monitors prior to any potentially high-risk activity, such as manure agitation, pumping, or pressure washing, to ensure that the monitor appropriately detects and warns users.
直读式气体监测仪可向工人警示在粪便处理过程中可能出现的潜在致命硫化氢(H₂S)暴露风险。许多制造商都提供低成本、低维护要求的H₂S监测仪,但它们的功能和性能存在差异,这给农民的选择带来了挑战。此外,关于这些设备在农业环境中的实际维护和性能的信息很少。本研究的目的是为农业工人提供信息,以帮助他们选择、维护和使用低成本的H₂S监测仪。这项实验室研究在一个猪舍中对几种低成本监测仪进行了为期一年的模拟使用评估。在18周内,将四种型号的监测仪暴露于1至10 ppm的H₂S浓度下,以检查报告浓度的漂移和报警反应时间的变化。在模拟的猪舍一年时间里,仅报警监测仪的性能下降速度比显示H₂S浓度的监测仪更快。令人担忧的是,在猪舍中,相当于139天(Altair)和289天(BW Clip)后,高浓度(20 ppm)报警出现故障,这远在监测仪报告的保质期内。显示浓度的型号出现故障的情况较少,但在受到20 ppm的H₂S挑战时,显示的浓度不准确。当受到20 ppm的挑战时,T40 Rattler的读数始终较高(+2.3 ppm),而Pac 3500的读数始终较低(-3.4 ppm)。这项研究证实,即使制造商不推荐,也需要对这些低成本监测仪进行常规的冲击测试,以确保监测仪对H₂S的存在做出反应。最重要的是,农业工人在进行任何潜在的高风险活动(如粪便搅拌、泵送或高压清洗)之前,应检查并对这些监测仪进行冲击测试,以确保监测仪能适当地检测并警告使用者。