El-Far Mohamed, Pellerin Charles, Pilote Louise, Fortin Jean-Francois, Lessard Ivan A D, Peretz Yoav, Wardrop Elizabeth, Salois Patrick, Bethell Richard C, Cordingley Michael G, Kukolj George
Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd,, 2100 Rue Cunard, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
J Transl Med. 2014 Sep 2;12:217. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0217-y.
Coexpression of CD160 and PD-1 on HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells defines a highly exhausted T-cell subset. CD160 binds to Herpes Virus Entry Mediator (HVEM) and blocking this interaction with HVEM antibodies reverses T-cell exhaustion. As HVEM binds both inhibitory and activatory receptors, our aim in the current study was to assess the impact of CD160-specific antibodies on the enhancement of T-cell activation.
Expression of the two CD160 isoforms; glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored (CD160-GPI) and the transmembrane isoforms (CD160-TM) was assessed in CD4 and CD8 primary T-cells by quantitative RT-PCR and Flow-cytometry. Binding of these isoforms to HVEM ligand and the differential capacities of CD160 and HVEM specific antibodies to inhibit this binding were further evaluated using a Time-Resolved Fluorescence assay (TRF). The impact of both CD160 and HVEM specific antibodies on enhancing T-cell functionality upon antigenic stimulation was performed in comparative ex vivo studies using primary cells from HIV-infected subjects stimulated with HIV antigens in the presence or absence of blocking antibodies to the key inhibitory receptor PD-1.
We first show that both CD160 isoforms, CD160-GPI and CD160-TM, were expressed in human primary CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. The two isoforms were also recognized by the HVEM ligand, although this binding was less pronounced with the CD160-TM isoform. Mechanistic studies revealed that although HVEM specific antibodies blocked its binding to CD160-GPI, surprisingly, these antibodies enhanced HVEM binding to CD160-TM, suggesting that potential antibody-mediated HVEM multimerization and/or induced conformational changes may be required for optimal CD160-TM binding. Triggering of CD160-GPI over-expressed on Jurkat cells with either bead-bound HVEM-Fc or anti-CD160 monoclonal antibodies enhanced cell activation, consistent with a positive co-stimulatory role for CD160-GPI. However, CD160-TM did not respond to this stimulation, likely due to the lack of optimal HVEM binding. Finally, ex vivo assays using PBMCs from HIV viremic subjects showed that the use of CD160-GPI-specific antibodies combined with blockade of PD-1 synergistically enhanced the proliferation of HIV-1 specific CD8+ T-cells upon antigenic stimulation.
Antibodies targeting CD160-GPI complement the blockade of PD-1 to enhance HIV-specific T-cell responses and warrant further investigation in the development of novel immunotherapeutic approaches.
HIV特异性CD8+T细胞上CD160和PD-1的共表达定义了一个高度耗竭的T细胞亚群。CD160与疱疹病毒进入介质(HVEM)结合,用HVEM抗体阻断这种相互作用可逆转T细胞耗竭。由于HVEM同时结合抑制性和激活性受体,我们在本研究中的目的是评估CD160特异性抗体对增强T细胞激活的影响。
通过定量RT-PCR和流式细胞术评估两种CD160异构体;糖基磷脂酰肌醇锚定(CD160-GPI)和跨膜异构体(CD160-TM)在CD4和CD8原代T细胞中的表达。使用时间分辨荧光测定法(TRF)进一步评估这些异构体与HVEM配体的结合以及CD160和HVEM特异性抗体抑制这种结合的不同能力。在比较性体外研究中,使用来自HIV感染受试者的原代细胞,在存在或不存在针对关键抑制性受体PD-1的阻断抗体的情况下用HIV抗原刺激,评估CD160和HVEM特异性抗体对抗抗原刺激后增强T细胞功能的影响。
我们首先表明,两种CD160异构体,CD160-GPI和CD160-TM,在人原代CD4+和CD8+T细胞中均有表达。这两种异构体也被HVEM配体识别,尽管CD160-TM异构体的这种结合不太明显。机制研究表明,虽然HVEM特异性抗体阻断了其与CD160-GPI的结合,但令人惊讶的是,这些抗体增强了HVEM与CD160-TM的结合,这表明最佳的CD160-TM结合可能需要潜在的抗体介导的HVEM多聚化和/或诱导的构象变化。用珠结合的HVEM-Fc或抗CD160单克隆抗体触发Jurkat细胞上过表达的CD160-GPI可增强细胞激活,这与CD160-GPI的阳性共刺激作用一致。然而,CD160-TM对这种刺激没有反应,可能是由于缺乏最佳的HVEM结合。最后,使用来自HIV病毒血症受试者的PBMC进行的体外试验表明,使用CD160-GPI特异性抗体联合阻断PD-1可在抗原刺激后协同增强HIV-1特异性CD8+T细胞的增殖。
靶向CD160-GPI的抗体补充了PD-1阻断,以增强HIV特异性T细胞反应,值得在新型免疫治疗方法的开发中进一步研究。