Department of Psychology, University of Florida.
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Oct;61(4):581-92. doi: 10.1037/cou0000043. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
Many studies of anti-trans prejudice have measured such attitudes using the Genderism and Transphobia Scale (GTS; Hill & Willoughby, 2005). The GTS is unique in assessing negative attitudes and propensity for violence toward trans people. The present research addressed previously observed limitations in the psychometric properties of data produced by the GTS, including inconsistencies in factor structure and subscale scoring across studies. Results across the present 2 studies (Ns = 314 and 250) yielded 2 refined versions of the GTS: the 22-item GTS-Revised (GTS-R) and a more abbreviated 13-item GTS-R-Short Form (GTS-R-SF), each of which produced stable 2-factor structures corresponding with the intended negative attitudes and propensity for violence dimensions of the GTS. The 2 versions differ in that the GTS-R-SF Genderism/Transphobia subscale focuses on more severe expressions of prejudicial attitudes, whereas the longer GTS-R Genderism/Transphobia subscale assesses subtle expressions of prejudice as well. The Gender-Bashing subscale is identical across the 2 versions. Thus, researchers and practitioners may choose the GTS-R or GTS-R-SF depending on the breadth of prejudicial attitudes they wish to assess. Reliability estimates for GTS-R and GTS-R-SF scale and subscale item responses were acceptable and stable across the 2 studies, and validity evidence was garnered in Study 2. These findings can inform use of the GTS-R and GTS-R-SF in research and practice settings, where psychometric precision and efficiency are both critical.
许多关于反跨性别偏见的研究都使用性别主义和跨性别恐惧症量表(GTS;Hill & Willoughby,2005)来衡量这种态度。GTS 的独特之处在于评估针对跨性别者的负面态度和暴力倾向。本研究解决了先前观察到的 GTS 数据心理测量特性的局限性,包括跨研究的因子结构和子量表评分不一致。本研究中的两项研究(N=314 和 250)的结果得出了 GTS 的两个修订版本:22 项 GTS-Revised(GTS-R)和一个更简短的 13 项 GTS-R-Short Form(GTS-R-SF),每个版本都产生了稳定的 2 因子结构,与 GTS 的负面态度和暴力倾向维度相对应。这两个版本的区别在于,GTS-R-SF 的性别主义/跨性别恐惧症子量表侧重于更严重的偏见态度表达,而较长的 GTS-R 性别主义/跨性别恐惧症子量表则评估了微妙的偏见表达。两个版本的性别攻击子量表是相同的。因此,研究人员和从业者可以根据他们希望评估的偏见态度的广度选择 GTS-R 或 GTS-R-SF。GTS-R 和 GTS-R-SF 量表和子量表项目反应的可靠性估计在两项研究中都是可接受的且稳定的,在研究 2 中获得了有效性证据。这些发现可以为 GTS-R 和 GTS-R-SF 在研究和实践环境中的使用提供信息,在这些环境中,心理测量的精度和效率都至关重要。