Suppr超能文献

一项基于社区的促进农村社区无烟政策的对照试验。

A controlled community-based trial to promote smoke-free policy in rural communities.

作者信息

Hahn Ellen J, Rayens Mary Kay, Adkins Sarah, Begley Kathy, York Nancy

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Tobacco Policy Research Program, Kentucky Center for Smoke-Free Policy, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2015 Winter;31(1):76-88. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12087. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Rural, tobacco-growing areas are disproportionately affected by tobacco use, secondhand smoke, and weak tobacco control policies. The purpose was to test the effects of a stage-specific, tailored policy-focused intervention on readiness for smoke-free policy, and policy outcomes in rural underserved communities.

METHODS

A controlled community-based trial including 37 rural counties. Data were collected annually with community advocates (n = 330) and elected officials (n = 158) in 19 intervention counties and 18 comparison counties over 5 years (average response rate = 68%). Intervention communities received policy development strategies from community advisors tailored to their stage of readiness and designed to build capacity, build demand, and translate and disseminate science. Policy outcomes were tracked over 5 years.

FINDINGS

Communities receiving the stage-specific, tailored intervention had higher overall community readiness scores and better policy outcomes than the comparison counties, controlling for county-level smoking rate, population size, and education. Nearly one-third of the intervention counties adopted smoke-free laws covering restaurants, bars, and all workplaces compared to none of the comparison counties.

CONCLUSIONS

The stage-specific, tailored policy-focused intervention acted as a value-added resource to local smoke-free campaigns by promoting readiness for policy, as well as actual policy change in rural communities. Although actual policy change and percent covered by the policies were modest, these areas need additional resources and efforts to build capacity, build demand, and translate and disseminate science in order to accelerate smoke-free policy change and reduce the enormous toll from tobacco in these high-risk communities.

摘要

目的

农村烟草种植地区受到烟草使用、二手烟及薄弱的烟草控制政策的影响尤为严重。本研究旨在测试一项针对特定阶段、量身定制的以政策为重点的干预措施对农村服务欠缺社区无烟政策准备情况及政策成果的影响。

方法

一项基于社区的对照试验,涵盖37个农村县。在5年时间里,每年对19个干预县和18个对照县的社区倡导者(n = 330)和民选官员(n = 158)进行数据收集(平均回复率 = 68%)。干预社区从社区顾问那里获得根据其准备阶段量身定制的政策制定策略,这些策略旨在建设能力、培养需求以及转化和传播科学知识。对政策成果进行了5年的跟踪。

结果

在控制了县级吸烟率、人口规模和教育水平后,接受特定阶段、量身定制干预的社区比对照县具有更高的整体社区准备得分和更好的政策成果。近三分之一的干预县通过了涵盖餐馆、酒吧和所有工作场所的无烟法律,而对照县无一通过。

结论

针对特定阶段、量身定制的以政策为重点的干预措施通过促进政策准备以及农村社区的实际政策变革,成为当地无烟运动的一项增值资源。尽管实际政策变革及政策覆盖百分比有限,但这些地区需要更多资源和努力来建设能力、培养需求以及转化和传播科学知识,以加速无烟政策变革并减少这些高风险社区烟草造成的巨大损害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验