Gilliland Randy, Blue Star John, Hansen Brian, Carpenter Bruce
a Department of Psychology , Brigham Young University , Provo , Utah , USA.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(6):581-92. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2014.958787. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Some authors theorize that relationship attachment difficulties play an etiological role in the development of hypersexual behavior. The research in support of this theory is plagued by small sample sizes and analyses that are limited to averages within 4 forced-choice categories of attachment. The present study seeks to further the understanding of relationship attachment styles and hypersexual behavior by analyzing both categorical and dimensional measures of attachment among a large sample of men (N = 136) seeking treatment for excessive sexual behaviors. Many, but not all, subjects reported attachment difficulties. Using cluster analysis, 4 distinct clusters appeared to be unique on measures of attachment, demographics, and shame proneness. The utility of the categorical versus the dimensional model of attachment, as well as the assessment and treatment implications for hypersexual behavior, are discussed.
一些作者提出理论,认为关系依恋困难在性欲亢进行为的发展中起病因学作用。支持这一理论的研究存在样本量小以及分析仅限于依恋的4个强制选择类别的平均值等问题。本研究旨在通过分析大量寻求过度性行为治疗的男性样本(N = 136)中的依恋分类和维度测量,进一步了解关系依恋风格和性欲亢进行为。许多但并非所有受试者都报告了依恋困难。使用聚类分析,在依恋、人口统计学和羞耻倾向测量方面,4个不同的聚类似乎是独特的。讨论了依恋的分类模型与维度模型的效用,以及对性欲亢进行为的评估和治疗意义。