Reid Rory C, Harper James M, Anderson Emily H
Department of Clinical Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):125-38. doi: 10.1002/cpp.609.
This article reports the findings of a study investigating coping strategies used by hypersexual patients (n = 71), compared with a control group (n = 73), in their attempts to defend against shame. Coping strategies were measured using the Compass of Shame Scale (CoSS) and hypersexual behaviour was measured by the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI). A multivariate analysis of variance of between-group differences was significant, and examination of post hoc univariate tests revealed that the sample of hypersexual patients defended against shame with higher levels of withdrawal and higher tendencies to attack self and others when compared with the control group. The effect sizes of these differences were moderate to large. A categorical analysis of the patient group indicated that the greatest percentages of elevated shame scores were clustered on the Withdrawal and Attack Self subscales of the CoSS. Between-group differences on the Avoidance subscale of the CoSS were not significant. The results of this study are discussed as they pertain to clinical practice, and future recommendations for research are offered.
本文报告了一项研究的结果,该研究调查了71名性欲亢进患者与73名对照组患者在试图抵御羞耻感时所采用的应对策略。应对策略使用羞耻感量表(CoSS)进行测量,性欲亢进行为则通过性欲亢进行为量表(HBI)进行测量。组间差异的多变量方差分析具有显著性,事后单变量检验显示,与对照组相比,性欲亢进患者样本在抵御羞耻感时表现出更高水平的退缩以及更高的自我攻击和他人攻击倾向。这些差异的效应大小为中等至较大。对患者组的分类分析表明,羞耻感得分升高的最大比例集中在CoSS的退缩和自我攻击子量表上。CoSS回避子量表上的组间差异不显著。本文讨论了该研究结果与临床实践的相关性,并提供了未来的研究建议。