Finfgeld-Connett Deborah
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Qual Health Res. 2014 Nov;24(11):1581-91. doi: 10.1177/1049732314548878. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
Early on, qualitative researchers predicted that metasynthesis research had the potential to significantly push knowledge development forward. More recently, scholars have questioned whether this is actually occurring. To examine this concern, a randomly selected sample of metasynthesis articles was systematically reviewed to identify the types of findings that have been produced. Based on this systematic examination, it appears that findings from metasynthesis investigations might not be reaching their full potential. Metasynthesis investigations frequently result in isolated findings rather than findings in relationship, and opportunities to generate research hypotheses and theoretical models are not always fully realized. With this in mind, methods for moving metasynthesis findings into relationship are discussed.
早期,定性研究人员预测元综合研究有潜力显著推动知识发展。最近,学者们质疑这一情况是否真的发生。为了审视这一问题,我们对随机抽取的元综合文章样本进行了系统回顾,以确定所产生的研究结果类型。基于这一系统考察,元综合研究的结果似乎并未充分发挥其潜力。元综合研究常常得出孤立的结果,而非相互关联的结果,生成研究假设和理论模型的机会也并非总能完全实现。考虑到这一点,本文讨论了将元综合研究结果联系起来的方法。