• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与 100 单位/毫升在老年 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验:来自 SENIOR 研究的结果。

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus 100 Units/mL in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the SENIOR Study.

机构信息

Klinikum Schwabing and Klinikum Bogenhausen, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Munich, Germany

The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1672-1680. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0168. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

DOI:10.2337/dc18-0168
PMID:29895556
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

SENIOR compared the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in older people (≥65 years old) with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

SENIOR was an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3b trial designed to enroll ∼20% of participants aged ≥75 years. Participants were randomized 1:1 to Gla-300 or Gla-100, titrated to a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose of 5.0-7.2 mmol/L (90-130 mg/dL).

RESULTS

In total, 1,014 participants were randomized (mean age: 71 years). Comparable reductions in HbA were observed from baseline to week 26 for Gla-300 (-0.89%) and Gla-100 (-0.91%) in the overall population (least squares mean difference: 0.02% [95% CI -0.092 to 0.129]) and for participants aged ≥75 years (-0.11% [-0.330 to 0.106]). Incidence and rates of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia events were low and similar between both treatment groups, with lower rates of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia with Gla-300. The lower risk of hypoglycemia with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was more apparent in the subgroup aged ≥75 years versus the overall population. Significantly lower annualized rates of documented symptomatic (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) hypoglycemia were observed (Gla-300: 1.12; Gla-100: 2.71; rate ratio: 0.45 [95% CI 0.25-0.83]).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety of Gla-300 was demonstrated in older people (≥65 years of age) with type 2 diabetes, with comparable reductions in HbA and similarly low or lower risk of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia versus Gla-100. A significant benefit in hypoglycemia reduction was seen in participants aged ≥75 years.

摘要

目的

SENIOR 比较了 300 单位/毫升胰岛素甘精(Gla-300)和 100 单位/毫升甘精(Gla-100)在年龄≥65 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

SENIOR 是一项开放性、双臂、平行组、多中心 3b 期试验,设计招募约 20%年龄≥75 岁的参与者。参与者按 1:1 随机分配至 Gla-300 或 Gla-100,滴定至空腹自我监测血浆葡萄糖 5.0-7.2mmol/L(90-130mg/dL)。

结果

共有 1014 名参与者被随机分组(平均年龄:71 岁)。在总体人群中,从基线到 26 周,Gla-300(-0.89%)和 Gla-100(-0.91%)观察到 HbA 的相似降低(最小二乘均数差异:0.02%[95%CI-0.092 至 0.129])和≥75 岁的参与者(-0.11%[-0.330 至 0.106])。两组治疗的确诊(≤3.9mmol/L[≤70mg/dL])或严重低血糖事件的发生率和发生率相似,Gla-300 的有症状低血糖发生率较低。与 Gla-100 相比,Gla-300 的低血糖风险较低,在年龄≥75 岁的亚组中更为明显,而在总体人群中则更为明显。观察到每年有症状(≤3.9mmol/L[≤70mg/dL])的确诊低血糖的发生率显著降低(Gla-300:1.12;Gla-100:2.71;率比:0.45[95%CI0.25-0.83])。

结论

Gla-300 在年龄≥65 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者中显示出疗效和安全性,HbA 降低相似,与 Gla-100 相比,有症状低血糖的风险较低或更低。在年龄≥75 岁的参与者中,观察到低血糖减少的显著益处。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus 100 Units/mL in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the SENIOR Study.一项比较甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与 100 单位/毫升在老年 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验:来自 SENIOR 研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1672-1680. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0168. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial.胰岛素甘精 300 单位/毫升(Gla-300)对比胰岛素甘精 100 单位/毫升(Gla-100)在 6-17 岁 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的疗效和安全性:EDITION JUNIOR 随机对照试验结果。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1512-1519. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1926. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2).在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的日本2型糖尿病患者中,新型甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与甘精胰岛素100 U/ml的比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 2)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/dom.12618. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1).在使用基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者中,新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升的比较:6 个月随机对照试验中的血糖控制和低血糖(EDITION 1)。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2755-62. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0991. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
5
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2).德谷胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升治疗口服降糖药和基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项 6 个月随机对照研究(EDITION 2)
Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec;37(12):3235-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
6
One-year sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal plus meal-time insulin: the EDITION 1 12-month randomized trial, including 6-month extension.与100 U/ml的甘精胰岛素相比,使用300 U/ml的新型甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者进行基础加餐时胰岛素治疗,可实现一年的持续血糖控制且低血糖发生率更低:EDITION 1 12个月随机试验,包括6个月延长期。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):835-42. doi: 10.1111/dom.12472. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3).在接受口服降糖药物治疗的初治2型糖尿病患者中,新型300U/ml甘精胰岛素与100U/ml甘精胰岛素的比较:一项随机对照试验(第3版)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
8
More Similarities Than Differences Testing Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial.在胰岛素初治 2 型糖尿病中,甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与德谷胰岛素 100 单位/毫升的更多相似之处而非差异之处:一项随机头对头 BRIGHT 试验。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2147-2154. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0559. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
9
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: the EDITION 2 randomized 12-month trial including 6-month extension.在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的2型糖尿病患者中,比较新型300 U/ml甘精胰岛素与100 U/ml甘精胰岛素的血糖控制及低血糖情况:EDITION 2随机12个月试验(包括6个月延长期)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Dec;17(12):1142-9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12532. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1).在日本1型糖尿病成人患者中,基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素联用甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与100 U/ml的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 1)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):375-83. doi: 10.1111/dom.12619. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of the experiences of insulin use by older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.一项关于老年 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素的体验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 22;25(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02318-3.
2
Efficacy and safety of basal insulins in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.基础胰岛素在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 21;15:1286827. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1286827. eCollection 2024.
3
Expert Opinion on Current Trends in the Use of Insulin in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes from the South-Eastern European Region and Israel.
东南欧地区和以色列2型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗当前趋势的专家意见
Diabetes Ther. 2024 May;15(5):897-915. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01556-z. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Real-World Persistence, Adherence, Hypoglycemia, and Health Care Resource Utilization in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Continued With the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analog Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL or Switched to a First-Generation Basal Insulin (Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL or Detemir 100).2型糖尿病患者继续使用第二代基础胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素300单位/毫升或换用第一代基础胰岛素(甘精胰岛素100单位/毫升或地特胰岛素100单位/毫升)后的真实世界持续性、依从性、低血糖情况及医疗资源利用情况
Clin Diabetes. 2023 Summer;41(3):425-434. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0096. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Use of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Gla-300 in Special Populations: A Narrative Mini-Review.在特殊人群中使用第二代基础胰岛素 Gla-300:叙事性迷你综述。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023;19(9):e090123212447. doi: 10.2174/1573399819666230109113205.
6
Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.在当前时代,基础胰岛素联合口服药物治疗(二甲双胍和格列美脲)的临床证据和基于实践的指南。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023;19(8):e090123212444. doi: 10.2174/1573399819666230109104300.
7
Update on the management of diabetes in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中糖尿病管理的最新进展。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Jul;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002705.
8
Clinical Use of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Hypothetical Case Studies.甘精胰岛素300 U/mL在2型糖尿病成人患者中的临床应用:假设性病例研究
Diabetes Ther. 2022 May;13(5):913-930. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01247-7. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Real-world persistence, adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs in people with type 2 diabetes switching from a first-generation basal insulin to a second-generation (insulin glargine 300 U/mL) vs an alternative first-generation basal insulin.在 2 型糖尿病患者中,从第一代基础胰岛素转换为第二代(甘精胰岛素 300U/ml)或其他第一代基础胰岛素时,真实世界中的持续性、依从性、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jun;28(6):592-603. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21436. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
10
Hypoglycemia in diabetes: An update on pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention.糖尿病中的低血糖:病理生理学、治疗及预防的最新进展
World J Diabetes. 2021 Dec 15;12(12):2036-2049. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i12.2036.