Law Keyne C, Chapman Alexander L
Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada; University of Southern Mississippi, Owings-McQuagge Hall #5025, 118 College Drive, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-0001, USA.
Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
Recent studies have suggested that types of rumination differ on how they impact psychopathology. Few research studies, however, have compared the two types of rumination. The primary aim of this research was to examine the effects of anger rumination and depressive rumination on factors related to self-conscious experiences (shame, self-blame, self-forgiveness) and negative affect among individuals with varying levels of borderline personality disorder (BPD) features.
Participants (N = 120), screened for BPD features, were randomly assigned to an anger or depressive mood induction followed by a rumination induction. Participants then completed self-report measures of emotional state and self-conscious experiences.
In both anger and depressive rumination conditions, participants reported significantly increased negative affect and decreased positive affect relative to their baseline measurements. Participants with elevated levels of BP features reported higher levels of self-blame and shame. In the low-BPD group, self-blame levels were higher following depressive rumination compared to anger rumination.
Due to resource constraints this study lacked a control condition involving no rumination. The range of BPD features was also restricted due to the use of a non-clinical sample thereby limiting the ability to examine BPD features as a moderator.
Despite the limitations, the current study is one of few investigations comparing the differential effects of induced anger rumination and depressive rumination on affect and self-conscious experiences. This study also addresses an important gap in literature on the mechanisms by which rumination influences negative affect.
近期研究表明,不同类型的沉思对精神病理学的影响存在差异。然而,很少有研究对这两种沉思类型进行比较。本研究的主要目的是考察愤怒沉思和抑郁沉思对不同边缘型人格障碍(BPD)特征水平个体的自我意识体验相关因素(羞耻、自责、自我宽恕)和消极情绪的影响。
对具有BPD特征的120名参与者进行筛查,将他们随机分配到愤怒或抑郁情绪诱导组,随后进行沉思诱导。参与者随后完成情绪状态和自我意识体验的自我报告测量。
在愤怒和抑郁沉思条件下,与基线测量相比,参与者报告消极情绪显著增加,积极情绪减少。具有较高BPD特征水平的参与者报告了更高水平的自责和羞耻感。在低BPD组中,与愤怒沉思相比,抑郁沉思后的自责水平更高。
由于资源限制,本研究缺乏不进行沉思的对照条件。由于使用非临床样本,BPD特征的范围也受到限制,从而限制了将BPD特征作为调节变量进行考察的能力。
尽管存在局限性,但本研究是少数比较诱发愤怒沉思和抑郁沉思对情绪和自我意识体验的差异影响的研究之一。本研究还填补了关于沉思影响消极情绪机制的文献中的一个重要空白。