Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
Personal Disord. 2011 Apr;2(2):142-50. doi: 10.1037/a0019478.
We examined relationships between depressive rumination, anger rumination, and features of borderline personality disorder in a sample of 93 students with a wide range of borderline symptoms. All completed self-report measures of borderline features; trait-level negative affect; depressive and anger rumination; and current symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Depressive and anger rumination were strongly associated with borderline features after controlling for comorbid symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Both types of rumination showed significant incremental validity over trait-level sadness, anger, and general negative affect in predicting borderline features. Relationships with borderline features were stronger for anger rumination than for depressive rumination. Relationships between trait-level negative affect and borderline features were substantially reduced when anger rumination was included in regression models, suggesting the need for longitudinal analyses of mediation. Findings suggest that severity of borderline symptoms is influenced by ruminative thinking in response to negative affect, especially anger.
我们在一个有广泛边缘症状的 93 名学生样本中,研究了抑郁性反刍思维、愤怒性反刍思维与边缘型人格障碍特征之间的关系。所有人都完成了边缘特征的自我报告测量;特质水平的负性情绪;抑郁和愤怒反刍;以及当前抑郁、焦虑和压力的症状。在控制了抑郁、焦虑和压力的共病症状后,抑郁性反刍和愤怒性反刍都与边缘特征密切相关。在预测边缘特征方面,两种反刍思维都比特质水平的悲伤、愤怒和一般负性情绪具有显著的增量有效性。愤怒反刍与边缘特征的关系比抑郁反刍更强。当将愤怒反刍纳入回归模型时,特质水平的负性情绪与边缘特征之间的关系大大降低,这表明需要对中介进行纵向分析。研究结果表明,边缘症状的严重程度受到对负性情绪(尤其是愤怒)的反刍思维的影响。