Marshall Ann, Spreadbury John, Cheston Richard, Coleman Peter, Ballinger Claire, Mullee Mark, Pritchard Jane, Russell Cynthia, Bartlett Elizabeth
a Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust.
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(6):526-35. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.954527. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
The aim of this paper is to report a pilot study in which participants who had recently received a diagnosis of dementia were randomised to either a 10-week group intervention or a waiting-list control.
Memory clinic staff with limited previous experience of group therapy were trained to lead a 10-week group therapy intervention called 'Living Well with Dementia'. Fifty-eight participants, all of whom had received a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular or Lewy body dementia within the previous 18 months, were randomised to receive either the intervention or treatment as usual (waiting-list control). Data collection occurred at baseline, within two weeks after the intervention finished and at 10-week follow-up.
The study met its recruitment targets, with a relatively low attrition rate for the intervention arm. The acceptability of the intervention and research methods was examined qualitatively and will be reported on elsewhere. For the primary outcome, measure of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), and secondary outcome, self-esteem, there was some evidence of improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group. There was, also, evidence of a reduction in cognitive functioning in the treatment group compared to the control. Such reported differences should be treated with caution because they are obtained from a pilot and not a definitive study.
This pilot study succeeded in collecting data to inform a future definitive cost effectiveness clinical trial of Living Well with Dementia group therapy.
本文旨在报告一项试点研究,该研究将近期被诊断为痴呆症的参与者随机分为接受为期10周的小组干预或等待名单对照组。
对以前小组治疗经验有限的记忆门诊工作人员进行培训,使其能够主持一项名为“与痴呆症和谐共处”的为期10周的小组治疗干预。58名参与者在过去18个月内均被诊断为阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆或路易体痴呆,他们被随机分配接受干预或常规治疗(等待名单对照)。在基线、干预结束后两周内以及10周随访时进行数据收集。
该研究达到了招募目标,干预组的损耗率相对较低。对干预措施和研究方法的可接受性进行了定性检查,相关结果将在其他地方报告。对于主要结局指标——阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QoL-AD)以及次要结局指标——自尊,与对照组相比,干预组有一些改善的迹象。此外,与对照组相比,治疗组的认知功能有下降的迹象。这些报告的差异应谨慎对待,因为它们来自一项试点研究而非确定性研究。
这项试点研究成功收集了数据,为未来关于“与痴呆症和谐共处”小组治疗的确定性成本效益临床试验提供了参考。