• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What influences uptake of psychosocial interventions by people living with early dementia? A qualitative study.什么因素影响早期痴呆症患者接受心理社会干预?一项定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2668-2688. doi: 10.1177/14713012211007397. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Relational counselling as a psychosocial intervention for dementia: Qualitative evidence from people living with dementia and family members.人际关系咨询作为一种针对痴呆症的心理社会干预措施:来自与痴呆症患者和家庭成员的定性证据。
Dementia (London). 2021 Aug;20(6):2091-2108. doi: 10.1177/1471301220984912. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
3
Journeying through Dementia Randomised Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for People Living with Early Dementia: Embedded Qualitative Study with Participants, Carers and Interventionists.痴呆症之旅:针对早期痴呆症患者的心理社会干预的随机对照试验:对参与者、照顾者和干预者进行的嵌入式定性研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Feb 4;16:231-244. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S293921. eCollection 2021.
4
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.辅助技术和远程监护以维持痴呆症患者的独立居家生活:ATTILA RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190.
5
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
6
7
"I just keep thinking that I don't want to rely on people." a qualitative study of how people living with dementia achieve and maintain independence at home: stakeholder perspectives.“我只是一直想着,我不想依赖别人。”一项关于痴呆症患者如何在家中实现和保持独立性的定性研究:利益相关者视角。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1406-6.
8
9
Tensions in dementia care in China: An interpretative phenomenological study from Shandong province.中国痴呆症护理中的紧张局势:来自山东省的阐释现象学研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Mar;15(1):e12291. doi: 10.1111/opn.12291. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
"I just don't focus on my needs." The unmet health needs of partner and offspring caregivers of people with dementia: A qualitative study.“我只是不关注自己的需求。”痴呆患者的伴侣和子女照顾者的未满足的健康需求:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Reimagining Dementia Care: A Complex Intervention Systematic Review on Optimising Social Prescribing (SP) for People Living With Dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom.重新构想痴呆症护理:一项关于优化英国痴呆症患者社会处方(SP)的复杂干预系统评价
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70289. doi: 10.1111/hex.70289.
2
Reimagining Dementia Care: A Complex Intervention Systematic Review on Optimising Social Prescribing (SP) for Carers of People Living With Dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom.重新构想痴呆症护理:一项关于优化英国痴呆症患者(PLWD)护理人员社会处方(SP)的复杂干预系统评价
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70286. doi: 10.1111/hex.70286.
3
Post-diagnostic support in Australia: Perspectives of people recently diagnosed with dementia and their carers.澳大利亚的诊断后支持:近期被诊断为痴呆症患者及其护理人员的观点。
Dementia (London). 2025 Apr 14;24(6):14713012251333880. doi: 10.1177/14713012251333880.

本文引用的文献

1
Recruiting hard to reach populations to studies: breaking the silence: an example from a study that recruited people with dementia.招募难以接触的人群参与研究:打破沉默:一项招募痴呆症患者的研究示例。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030829.
2
Psychosocial Interventions for Community-Dwelling People Following Diagnosis of Mild to Moderate Dementia: Findings of a Systematic Scoping Review.社区居住的轻度至中度痴呆症患者的心理社会干预措施:系统范围综述的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;27(6):641-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.12.027. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Individual goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation to improve everyday functioning for people with early-stage dementia: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (the GREAT trial).个体化目标导向认知康复对改善早期痴呆患者日常功能的效果:一项多中心随机对照试验(GREAT 试验)。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 May;34(5):709-721. doi: 10.1002/gps.5076. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Dementia-friendly community initiatives: An integrative review.痴呆症友好社区倡议:综合述评。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2035-2045. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14746. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries.获取和使用正式痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:在 8 个欧洲国家进行的一项焦点小组研究,涉及痴呆症患者、非正式照顾者以及卫生和社会保健专业人员的发现。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1.
6
Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: a synthesis of systematic reviews.痴呆症患者的心理社会干预:系统评价综述。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Apr;23(4):393-403. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1423031. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Strategies to improve recruitment of people with dementia to research studies.改善痴呆症患者参与研究招募情况的策略。
Dementia (London). 2019 Oct-Nov;18(7-8):2494-2504. doi: 10.1177/1471301217748503. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Targeting Behavioral Symptoms and Functional Decline in Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对痴呆症的行为症状和功能下降:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):339-345. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15194. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Rights in Mind: Thinking Differently About Dementia and Disability.心中的权利:以不同方式看待痴呆与残疾
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):1075-1088. doi: 10.1177/1471301217701506. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Safe and Inclusive Research Practices for Qualitative Research Involving People with Dementia: A Review of Key Issues and Strategies.涉及痴呆症患者的定性研究的安全与包容性研究实践:关键问题与策略综述
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):1042-1059. doi: 10.1177/1471301217701274. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

什么因素影响早期痴呆症患者接受心理社会干预?一项定性研究。

What influences uptake of psychosocial interventions by people living with early dementia? A qualitative study.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), 7315University of Sheffield, UK.

Centre for Applied Dementia Research, University of Bradford, UK; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), 7315University of Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2668-2688. doi: 10.1177/14713012211007397. Epub 2021 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/14713012211007397
PMID:33956547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8723173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health policy promotes post-diagnostic support for people affected by dementia. Evidence suggests psychosocial interventions can effectively support people living with dementia after diagnosis. Yet, what influences uptake of psychosocial interventions by people with early dementia is poorly understood. This research aimed to identify influences on uptake of psychosocial interventions by people with early dementia.

METHODS

Sixteen face-to-face semi-structured interviews with people with early dementia, either alone or with a family member(s), were completed. Twelve staff participated in semi-structured interviews or a focus group. Thematic analysis and triangulation enabled identification of overall themes across different participant groups and interview types.

MAIN FINDINGS

Four overarching themes influencing uptake were identified: (1) adjusting to a diagnosis, (2) appeal of activities and perception of benefit, (3) service and societal context, and (4) relationships and communication. Individual responses to diagnosis, experiences of dementia and dementia services influenced uptake. Group interventions were discussed the most by all participants. Group interventions offering social contact, peer support, information, enjoyable activities and mental stimulation were valued. However, group interventions specifically aimed at people with dementia did not appeal to all. Ability to travel and convenience of locations were important. Continuing with community activities not focused on dementia was valued. Stigma around dementia appeared to discourage uptake. Emotional and practical support from family was key to facilitating uptake as were the relationships between people with dementia and staff.

CONCLUSION

A complex interplay of individual, service and societal influences affect uptake of psychosocial interventions by people with early dementia. How interventions and which services can enable people with early dementia remain engaged in their everyday lives needs consideration. Further research examining uptake of specific interventions commonly offered to people living with early dementia is needed. Involving people with early dementia in designing interventions aiming to support them is paramount.

摘要

背景

健康政策促进了对受痴呆影响的人的诊断后支持。有证据表明,心理社会干预可以在诊断后有效地支持痴呆患者。然而,人们对早期痴呆患者接受心理社会干预的影响因素知之甚少。本研究旨在确定影响早期痴呆患者接受心理社会干预的因素。

方法

对 16 名早期痴呆症患者(单独或与家庭成员一起)进行了 16 次面对面的半结构化访谈。12 名工作人员参加了半结构化访谈或焦点小组。主题分析和三角测量使不同参与者群体和访谈类型之间能够识别出总体主题。

主要发现

确定了影响接受程度的四个总体主题:(1)适应诊断,(2)活动吸引力和感知益处,(3)服务和社会背景,以及(4)关系和沟通。个人对诊断的反应、痴呆症的经历和痴呆症服务的体验影响了接受程度。所有参与者都讨论了小组干预最多。提供社交接触、同伴支持、信息、有趣活动和精神刺激的小组干预受到重视。然而,并非所有参与者都对专门针对痴呆症患者的小组干预感兴趣。出行能力和地点便利是很重要的。继续参加不以痴呆症为重点的社区活动受到重视。痴呆症的耻辱感似乎阻碍了接受程度。来自家庭的情感和实际支持是促进接受程度的关键,而痴呆症患者与工作人员之间的关系也是如此。

结论

个人、服务和社会影响的复杂相互作用影响了早期痴呆症患者对心理社会干预的接受程度。需要考虑如何使干预措施和哪些服务能够使早期痴呆症患者继续参与他们的日常生活。需要进一步研究检查早期痴呆症患者普遍接受的特定干预措施的接受情况。让早期痴呆症患者参与设计旨在支持他们的干预措施至关重要。