Comparative effectiveness trials: generic misassumptions underlying the SUPPORT controversy.
作者信息
Tyson Jon E, Walsh Michele, D'Angio Carl T
机构信息
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas;
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
出版信息
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):651-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4176. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comparative effectiveness trials: generic misassumptions underlying the SUPPORT controversy.比较效果试验：支持疗法争议背后的一般错误假设。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):651-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4176. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
2
[When the information provided to participants of a comparative effectiveness trial ends up in the court: The opening of Pandora's box?].当提供给比较效果试验参与者的信息最终进入法庭时：潘多拉魔盒被打开了？
Med Clin (Barc). 2016 Jul 15;147(2):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
3
SUPPORT controversy's lessons for informed consent.支持关于知情同意的争议教训。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Dec;3(12):928-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00417-8. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
4
Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment.SUPPORT 试验中的产前同意：挑战、成本和有代表性的入组。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e215-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3353. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
5
Risks and benefits of comparative effectiveness research in preterm infants: SUPPORT.早产儿比较效果研究的风险与益处：SUPPORT研究
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):17-21. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.85.
6
Foreseeable risks? Informed consent for studies within the standard of care.可预见的风险？在医疗标准范围内进行研究的知情同意。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):306-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1415113. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure with or without prophylactic surfactant therapy in the premature infant with respiratory distress syndrome.
Pediatr Radiol. 2000 Oct;30(10):713-4. doi: 10.1007/s002470000302.
8
[Measuring errors in neonatal randomized controlled trials. Deficient quality concerning the informed consent].[测量新生儿随机对照试验中的误差。知情同意方面质量不足]
Lakartidningen. 2001 May 16;98(20):2474-5.
9
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial.随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Saudi Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):145; author reply 145; discussion 145. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2004.145.
10
Obstructive sleep apnoea.
Lancet. 1999 Oct 2;354(9185):1212; author reply 1213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75423-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Methodological issues in the design and analyses of neonatal research studies: Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.新生儿研究的设计与分析中的方法学问题：美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络的经验
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Oct;40(6):374-384. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
SUPPORT and the Ethics of Study Implementation: Lessons for Comparative Effectiveness Research from the Trial of Oxygen Therapy for Premature Babies.支持与研究实施的伦理：早产儿氧疗试验对比较效果研究的启示
Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Jan-Feb;45(1):30-40. doi: 10.1002/hast.407. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care.知情同意、比较效果与学习型医疗保健。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):766-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1313674.
2
The OHRP and SUPPORT--another view.人类研究保护办公室（OHRP）与“支持性治疗与预后及偏好研究”（SUPPORT）——另一种观点。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):e3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1308015. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
The OHRP and SUPPORT.人类研究保护办公室与支持项目
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):e36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1307008. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
4
In support of SUPPORT--a view from the NIH.支持“支持性医护计划”——来自美国国立卫生研究院的观点
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2349-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1306986. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
5
Informed consent and SUPPORT.知情同意与支持。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1929-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1304996. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
6
Oxygen-saturation targets in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿的氧饱和度目标
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1949-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1304827. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.研究与治疗的区分：一种用于确定哪些活动应接受伦理监督的有问题的方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. doi: 10.1002/hast.133.
8
Neurodevelopmental outcomes in the early CPAP and pulse oximetry trial.早期 CPAP 和脉搏血氧饱和度试验中的神经发育结果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2495-504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208506.
9
The nocebo effect of informed consent.知情同意的反安慰剂效应。
Bioethics. 2014 Mar;28(3):147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01983.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
10
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.以患者为中心的结果研究协会（PCORI）的国家研究重点及初步研究议程。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.500.
Zotero 插件