• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.

作者信息

Kass Nancy E, Faden Ruth R, Goodman Steven N, Pronovost Peter, Tunis Sean, Beauchamp Tom L

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. doi: 10.1002/hast.133.

DOI:10.1002/hast.133
PMID:23315895
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.研究与治疗的区分：一种用于确定哪些活动应接受伦理监督的有问题的方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. doi: 10.1002/hast.133.
2
Ethical oversight of research on patient care.对患者护理研究的伦理监督。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S2-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.132.
3
Ethical oversight: serving the best interests of patients. Commentary.伦理监督：服务于患者的最大利益。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S34-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.138.
4
A prescription for ethical learning. Commentary.一份道德学习的处方。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S28-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.135.
5
The unbelievable rightness of being in clinical trials. Commentary.参与临床试验的难以置信的正确性。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S30-1. doi: 10.1002/hast.136.
6
Advances in the research enterprise. Commentary.研究事业的进展。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S43-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.141.
7
Reform within the common rule? Commentary.《共同规则》框架内的改革？评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S40-2. doi: 10.1002/hast.140.
8
Making the transition to a learning health care system. Commentary.向学习型医疗保健系统转型。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S32-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.137.
9
Evaluation as part of operations: reconciling the common rule and continuous improvement. Commentary.作为运营一部分的评估：协调通用规则与持续改进。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S37-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.139.
10
Assessing the case for the regulation of research.评估研究监管的理由。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(8):63-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482646.

引用本文的文献

1
A Justice-First Approach to Ambient Intelligence in Healthcare.医疗保健中环境智能的正义优先方法。
Am J Bioeth. 2025 May 9:1-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2497972.
2
Implementing a rapid-learning health system in early intervention services for psychosis: qualitative evaluation of its feasibility and acceptability.在精神病早期干预服务中实施快速学习型健康系统：对其可行性和可接受性的定性评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 14;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01281-w.
3
Current Consent Models Perpetuate Ignorance in Pediatric Critical Care.
当前的同意模式使儿科重症监护中的无知长期存在。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 May 1;26(5):e748-e750. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003730. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
4
A Just Genomics Needs an ELSI of Translation.公正的基因组学需要转化的伦理、法律和社会影响研究。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S126-S135. doi: 10.1002/hast.4938.
5
Ethical Issues in Implementation Science: A Qualitative Interview Study of Participating Clinicians.实施科学中的伦理问题：对参与临床医生的定性访谈研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2388537. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
6
The Integration of Clinical Trials With the Practice of Medicine: Repairing a House Divided.临床试验与医学实践的整合：弥合分歧。
JAMA. 2024 Jul 9;332(2):153-162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4088.
7
Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance.生成式人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用、整合和治理：基于实施科学的转化途径。
Implement Sci. 2024 Mar 15;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01357-9.
8
Gathering speed and countering tensions in the rapid learning health system.在快速学习型卫生系统中加快速度并应对紧张局势。
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Jan 3;7(3):e10358. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10358. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study.实用临床试验随机分组中的临床推理：一项定性访谈研究。
Trials. 2023 Jun 27;24(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07445-3.
10
"It's personalized, but it's still bucket based": The promise of personalized medicine vs. the reality of genomic risk stratification in a breast cancer screening trial.“这是个性化的，但仍基于分组”：乳腺癌筛查试验中个性化医疗的前景与基因组风险分层的现实
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(3):228-253. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2022.2115348. Epub 2022 Sep 2.