• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗腰椎间盘突出症患者术前残疾的患病率及严重程度

Prevalence and severity of preoperative disabilities in Iranian patients with lumbar disc herniation.

作者信息

Omidi-Kashani Farzad, Hasankhani Ebrahim Ghayem, Moghadam Mohammad Hallaj, Esfandiari Mohammad Sadegh

机构信息

Farzad Omidi-Kashani MD, Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani MD, Mohammad Hallaj Moghadam MD, Mohammad Sadegh Esfandiari MD, Orthopedic Research Center Department of Orthopedic Surgery Imam Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2013 Dec;1(2):78-81. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

PMID:25207293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4151421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Literature recommends that refractory cases with lumbar disc herniation and appropriate indications are better to be treated surgically, but do all the patients throughout the world consent to the surgery with a same disability and pain threshold? We aim to elucidate the prevalence and severity of disabilities and pain in Iranian patients with lumbar disc herniation who have consented to the surgery.

METHODS

In this case series study, we clinically evaluated 194 (81 female and 113 male) admitted patients with primary, simple, and stable L4-L5 or L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation who were undergoing surgical discectomy. The mean age of the patients was 38.3±11.2 (range: 18-76 years old). Disabilities were evaluated by the items of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire and severity of pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Chi-square test was used to compare the qualitative variables.

RESULTS

Severe disability (39.2%) and crippled (29.9%) were the two most common types of disabilities. Mean ODI score was 56.7±21.1 (range: 16-92). Total mean VAS in all patients was 6.1±1.9 (range: 0-10). Sex and level of disc herniation had no statistical effect on preoperative ODI and VAS. The scale of six was the most frequent scale of preoperative VAS in our patients.

CONCLUSION

Iranian patients with lumbar disc herniation who consented to surgery have relatively severe pain or disability. These severities in pain or disabilities have no correlation with sex or level of disc herniation and are not equal with developed countries.

摘要

背景

文献表明,腰椎间盘突出症的难治性病例且有合适指征时,手术治疗效果更佳,但全世界所有患者对于手术的接受程度是否都相同,其残疾和疼痛阈值是否都一样?我们旨在阐明同意接受手术治疗的伊朗腰椎间盘突出症患者的残疾和疼痛的患病率及严重程度。

方法

在本病例系列研究中,我们对194例(81例女性和113例男性)因原发性、单纯性和稳定性L4-L5或L5-S1腰椎间盘突出症而接受手术椎间盘切除术的住院患者进行了临床评估。患者的平均年龄为38.3±11.2岁(范围:18-76岁)。通过奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)问卷项目评估残疾情况,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛严重程度。采用卡方检验比较定性变量。

结果

严重残疾(39.2%)和残疾(29.9%)是两种最常见的残疾类型。平均ODI评分为56.7±21.1(范围:16-92)。所有患者的总平均VAS为6.1±1.9(范围:0-10)。性别和椎间盘突出水平对术前ODI和VAS无统计学影响。在我们的患者中,6分是术前VAS最常见的评分。

结论

同意接受手术治疗的伊朗腰椎间盘突出症患者有相对严重的疼痛或残疾。这些疼痛或残疾的严重程度与性别或椎间盘突出水平无关,且与发达国家不同。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and severity of preoperative disabilities in Iranian patients with lumbar disc herniation.伊朗腰椎间盘突出症患者术前残疾的患病率及严重程度
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2013 Dec;1(2):78-81. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
2
Higher preoperative Oswestry Disability Index is associated with better surgical outcome in upper lumbar disc herniations.术前Oswestry功能障碍指数较高与上腰椎间盘突出症更好的手术结果相关。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):117-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0527-3. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
3
The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.年轻、活跃人群腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的结果:按突出类型和节段的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42.
4
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Does duration of preoperative sciatica impact surgical outcomes in patients with lumbar disc herniation?术前坐骨神经痛的持续时间会影响腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术效果吗?
Neurol Res Int. 2014;2014:565189. doi: 10.1155/2014/565189. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for the treatment of L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation and the influence of iliac crest height on its clinical effects.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术治疗L5-S1腰椎间盘突出症及髂嵴高度对其临床疗效的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Aug;22(2):866. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10298. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
7
[The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].[用于治疗腰骶部脊柱退行性疾病的DIAM脊柱稳定系统]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.
8
Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial.开窗髓核切除术与显微镜下开窗髓核切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03396-x.
9
Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery.接受腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗的年轻患者的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):448-455. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE16136. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) via a Transforaminal and Interlaminar Combined Approach for Very Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) Between L4/5 and L5/S1 Level.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合经椎间孔入路和经椎间孔入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 水平之间非常高迁移腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jun 7;26:e922777. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922777.

引用本文的文献

1
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 1. Epidemiology and Natural Course.《2021年腰椎间盘突出症临床实践指南精要:1. 流行病学与自然病程》
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jul 27;6(4):319-321. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0042. eCollection 2022.
2
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The pathogenesis of degeneration of the intervertebral disc and emerging therapies in the management of back pain.椎间盘退变的发病机制及腰痛管理中的新兴疗法。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Oct;94(10):1298-304. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28986.
2
The physiology of low back pain.下背痛的生理学
Prim Care. 2012 Sep;39(3):487-98. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.06.014.
3
Management of degenerative disk disease and chronic low back pain.退行性椎间盘疾病与慢性下腰痛的管理
Orthop Clin North Am. 2011 Oct;42(4):513-28, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.07.009.
4
Low back pain in Iran: a growing need to adapt and implement evidence-based practice in developing countries.伊朗的下腰痛:发展中国家适应和实施基于证据的实践的迫切需要。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):E638-46. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fa1da2.
5
The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain: the influence of age, gender, and individual radiographic features.腰椎间盘退变与下腰痛的关系:年龄、性别和个体影像学特征的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):531-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa5b33.
6
A short report comparing outcomes between L4/L5 and L5/S1 single-level discectomy surgery.一份比较L4/L5和L5/S1单节段椎间盘切除术手术效果的简短报告。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):40-2. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b38537.
7
An evidence-based approach to spine surgery.一种基于证据的脊柱手术方法。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl):15S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1062860609348743.
8
Lumbar discectomy outcomes vary by herniation level in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.在脊柱患者预后研究试验中,腰椎间盘切除术的预后因突出节段而异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1811-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00913.
9
The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.年轻、活跃人群腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的结果:按突出类型和节段的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42.
10
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.