Basso Frédéric, Robert-Demontrond Philippe, Hayek Maryvonne, Anton Jean-Luc, Nazarian Bruno, Roth Muriel, Oullier Olivier
Psychology@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science, St Clements Building, London, United Kingdom; Graduate School of Management, University Rennes 1 & Center for Research in Economics and Management, UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France; Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LPC UMR 7290, Cognitive Psychology Laboratory, Fédération de Recherche 3C, FR 3512, Case D, Marseille, France.
Graduate School of Management, University Rennes 1 & Center for Research in Economics and Management, UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 10;9(9):e100368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100368. eCollection 2014.
A Food Imitating Product (FIP) is a household cleaner or a personal care product that exhibits food attributes in order to enrich consumption experience. As revealed by many cases worldwide, such a marketing strategy led to unintentional self-poisonings and deaths. FIPs therefore constitute a very serious health and public policy issue. To understand why FIPs are a threat, we first conducted a qualitative analysis on real-life cases of household cleaners and personal care products-related phone calls at a poison control center followed by a behavioral experiment. Unintentional self-poisoning in the home following the accidental ingestion of a hygiene product by a healthy adult is very likely to result from these products being packaged like foodstuffs. Our hypothesis is that FIPs are non-verbal food metaphors that could fool the brain of consumers. We therefore conducted a subsequent functional neuroimaging (fMRI) experiment that revealed how visual processing of FIPs leads to cortical taste inferences. Considered in the grounded cognition perspective, the results of our studies reveal that healthy adults can unintentionally categorize a personal care product as something edible when a food-like package is employed to market nonedible and/or dangerous products. Our methodology combining field (qualitative) and laboratory (behavioral and functional neuroimaging) findings could be of particular relevance for policy makers, as it can help screening products prior to their market release--e.g. the way they are packaged and how they can potentially confuse the mind of consumers--and therefore save lives.
食品仿冒产品(FIP)是一种家用清洁剂或个人护理产品,具有食品属性以丰富消费体验。全球许多案例表明,这种营销策略导致了意外的自我中毒和死亡。因此,FIP构成了一个非常严重的健康和公共政策问题。为了理解为什么FIP是一种威胁,我们首先对一家毒物控制中心接到的与家用清洁剂和个人护理产品相关的电话的实际案例进行了定性分析,随后进行了一项行为实验。健康成年人意外摄入卫生产品后在家中发生的意外自我中毒很可能是由于这些产品采用了类似食品的包装。我们的假设是,FIP是非语言的食物隐喻,可能会误导消费者的大脑。因此,我们随后进行了一项功能性神经成像(fMRI)实验,揭示了FIP的视觉处理如何导致皮层味觉推断。从扎根认知的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,当使用类似食品的包装来销售不可食用和/或危险产品时,健康成年人可能会无意中将个人护理产品归类为可食用的东西。我们将实地(定性)和实验室(行为和功能性神经成像)研究结果相结合的方法可能对政策制定者特别有意义,因为它可以帮助在产品上市前进行筛选——例如它们的包装方式以及它们如何可能迷惑消费者的思维——从而挽救生命。