• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么人们会喝洗发水?食品仿冒产品为了营销目的在欺骗大脑并危及消费者。

Why people drink shampoo? Food Imitating Products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes.

作者信息

Basso Frédéric, Robert-Demontrond Philippe, Hayek Maryvonne, Anton Jean-Luc, Nazarian Bruno, Roth Muriel, Oullier Olivier

机构信息

Psychology@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science, St Clements Building, London, United Kingdom; Graduate School of Management, University Rennes 1 & Center for Research in Economics and Management, UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France; Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LPC UMR 7290, Cognitive Psychology Laboratory, Fédération de Recherche 3C, FR 3512, Case D, Marseille, France.

Graduate School of Management, University Rennes 1 & Center for Research in Economics and Management, UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 10;9(9):e100368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100368. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0100368
PMID:25207971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4160172/
Abstract

A Food Imitating Product (FIP) is a household cleaner or a personal care product that exhibits food attributes in order to enrich consumption experience. As revealed by many cases worldwide, such a marketing strategy led to unintentional self-poisonings and deaths. FIPs therefore constitute a very serious health and public policy issue. To understand why FIPs are a threat, we first conducted a qualitative analysis on real-life cases of household cleaners and personal care products-related phone calls at a poison control center followed by a behavioral experiment. Unintentional self-poisoning in the home following the accidental ingestion of a hygiene product by a healthy adult is very likely to result from these products being packaged like foodstuffs. Our hypothesis is that FIPs are non-verbal food metaphors that could fool the brain of consumers. We therefore conducted a subsequent functional neuroimaging (fMRI) experiment that revealed how visual processing of FIPs leads to cortical taste inferences. Considered in the grounded cognition perspective, the results of our studies reveal that healthy adults can unintentionally categorize a personal care product as something edible when a food-like package is employed to market nonedible and/or dangerous products. Our methodology combining field (qualitative) and laboratory (behavioral and functional neuroimaging) findings could be of particular relevance for policy makers, as it can help screening products prior to their market release--e.g. the way they are packaged and how they can potentially confuse the mind of consumers--and therefore save lives.

摘要

食品仿冒产品(FIP)是一种家用清洁剂或个人护理产品,具有食品属性以丰富消费体验。全球许多案例表明,这种营销策略导致了意外的自我中毒和死亡。因此,FIP构成了一个非常严重的健康和公共政策问题。为了理解为什么FIP是一种威胁,我们首先对一家毒物控制中心接到的与家用清洁剂和个人护理产品相关的电话的实际案例进行了定性分析,随后进行了一项行为实验。健康成年人意外摄入卫生产品后在家中发生的意外自我中毒很可能是由于这些产品采用了类似食品的包装。我们的假设是,FIP是非语言的食物隐喻,可能会误导消费者的大脑。因此,我们随后进行了一项功能性神经成像(fMRI)实验,揭示了FIP的视觉处理如何导致皮层味觉推断。从扎根认知的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,当使用类似食品的包装来销售不可食用和/或危险产品时,健康成年人可能会无意中将个人护理产品归类为可食用的东西。我们将实地(定性)和实验室(行为和功能性神经成像)研究结果相结合的方法可能对政策制定者特别有意义,因为它可以帮助在产品上市前进行筛选——例如它们的包装方式以及它们如何可能迷惑消费者的思维——从而挽救生命。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/9ae53f366a48/pone.0100368.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/7e076d8569ff/pone.0100368.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/a01de98bb77a/pone.0100368.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/9ae53f366a48/pone.0100368.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/7e076d8569ff/pone.0100368.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/a01de98bb77a/pone.0100368.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5e/4160172/9ae53f366a48/pone.0100368.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Why people drink shampoo? Food Imitating Products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes.为什么人们会喝洗发水?食品仿冒产品为了营销目的在欺骗大脑并危及消费者。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 10;9(9):e100368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100368. eCollection 2014.
2
Assessing the Role of Shape and Label in the Misleading Packaging of Food Imitating Products: From Empirical Evidence to Policy Recommendation.评估形状和标签在仿冒食品误导性包装中的作用:从实证证据到政策建议。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00450. eCollection 2016.
3
Evaluation of cosmetic product exposures reported to the Milan Poison Control Centre, Italy from 2005 to 2010.评估 2005 年至 2010 年期间向意大利米兰中毒控制中心报告的化妆品产品暴露情况。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Dec;50(10):902-10. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2012.740484. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
Characterization of the phone-calls made to a poison center related to household and cosmetics products exposition in pediatrics.与儿科家庭及化妆品产品暴露相关的拨打中毒控制中心电话的特征分析。
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019 Oct;90(5):500-507. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i5.1017.
5
The role of personal values in Chinese consumers' food consumption decisions. A case study of healthy drinks.个人价值观在中国消费者食品消费决策中的作用。以健康饮料为例的案例研究。
Appetite. 2014 Feb;73:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
Poisoning due to household products: A ten years retrospective analysis of telephone calls to the National Poisons Information Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.家用产品中毒:对印度新德里全印医学科学研究所国家毒物信息中心接到的电话进行的十年回顾性分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Aug;58:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
2011 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 29th Annual Report.2011 年美国毒物控制中心协会国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)年度报告:第 29 次年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Dec;50(10):911-1164. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2012.746424.
8
2015 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 33rd Annual Report.美国毒物控制中心协会国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)2015年年报:第33次年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016 Dec;54(10):924-1109. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1245421.
9
2014 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 32nd Annual Report.美国中毒控制中心协会国家中毒数据系统(NPDS)2014年年报:第32次年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53(10):962-1147. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1102927.
10
Ignorance is bliss. How parents of preschool children make sense of front-of-package visuals and claims on food.无知是福。学龄前儿童的父母如何理解食品包装正面的视觉信息和宣传语。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.100. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Extrinsic Factors Underlying Food Valuation in the Human Brain.人类大脑中食物估值的外在因素
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jul 24;14:131. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
2
Basic taste processing recruits bilateral anteroventral and middle dorsal insulae: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fMRI studies.基本味觉处理涉及双侧前腹侧和中背侧脑岛:一项基于功能磁共振成像研究的激活可能性估计元分析。
Brain Behav. 2017 Mar 10;7(4):e00655. doi: 10.1002/brb3.655. eCollection 2017 Apr.
3
Health and Pleasure in Consumers' Dietary Food Choices: Individual Differences in the Brain's Value System.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction to 30th anniversary perspectives on cognitive science: past, present, and future.认知科学30周年展望:过去、现在与未来导论
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;2(3):322-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01104.x.
2
Left brain, right brain: facts and fantasies.左脑、右脑:事实与幻想。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001767. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
3
[Combined behavioural and neuroscientific insights can improve anti-tobacco strategies].行为学与神经科学的综合见解可改善控烟策略
消费者日常饮食选择中的健康与愉悦:大脑价值系统的个体差异
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0156333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156333. eCollection 2016.
4
Assessing the Role of Shape and Label in the Misleading Packaging of Food Imitating Products: From Empirical Evidence to Policy Recommendation.评估形状和标签在仿冒食品误导性包装中的作用:从实证证据到政策建议。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00450. eCollection 2016.
5
The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches.最甜蜜之事:棱角、对称性及元素数量对形状效价与形状-味道匹配的影响
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 15;6:1382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01382. eCollection 2015.
Med Sci (Paris). 2013 Nov;29(11):1042-50. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20132911022. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
Behavioural insights are vital to policy-making.行为洞察对政策制定至关重要。
Nature. 2013 Sep 26;501(7468):463. doi: 10.1038/501463a.
5
An evaluation of the left-brain vs. right-brain hypothesis with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging.静息态功能磁共振成像评估左右脑假说。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e71275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071275. eCollection 2013.
6
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电:为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Metaphors and verbal creativity: the role of the right hemisphere.隐喻与言语创造力:右脑的作用。
Laterality. 2012;17(5):602-14. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2011.599936. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Explaining embodied cognition results.解释体现认知的结果。
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):773-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
The repetition paradigm: enhancement of novel metaphors and suppression of conventional metaphors in the left inferior parietal lobe.重复范式:左下顶叶对新颖隐喻的增强和对传统隐喻的抑制。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2705-2719. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Appearance matters: neural correlates of food choice and packaging aesthetics.外观很重要:食物选择和包装美学的神经关联。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041738. Epub 2012 Jul 25.