Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2650, USA.
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):773-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
From the late 1950s until 1975, cognition was understood mainly as disembodied symbol manipulation in cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and the nascent field of Cognitive Science. The idea of embodied cognition entered the field of Cognitive Linguistics at its beginning in 1975. Since then, cognitive linguists, working with neuroscientists, computer scientists, and experimental psychologists, have been developing a neural theory of thought and language (NTTL). Central to NTTL are the following ideas: (a) we think with our brains, that is, thought is physical and is carried out by functional neural circuitry; (b) what makes thought meaningful are the ways those neural circuits are connected to the body and characterize embodied experience; (c) so-called abstract ideas are embodied in this way as well, as is language. Experimental results in embodied cognition are seen not only as confirming NTTL but also explained via NTTL, mostly via the neural theory of conceptual metaphor. Left behind more than three decades ago is the old idea that cognition uses the abstract manipulation of disembodied symbols that are meaningless in themselves but that somehow constitute internal "representations of external reality" without serious mediation by the body and brain. This article uniquely explains the connections between embodied cognition results since that time and results from cognitive linguistics, experimental psychology, computational modeling, and neuroscience.
从 20 世纪 50 年代末到 1975 年,认知主要被理解为认知心理学、语言学、人工智能和新兴认知科学领域中没有实体的符号操作。具身认知的概念在 1975 年认知语言学诞生之初就进入了该领域。从那时起,认知语言学家与神经科学家、计算机科学家和实验心理学家合作,一直在开发一种思维和语言的神经理论(NTTL)。NTTL 的核心思想有以下几点:(a)我们用大脑思考,也就是说,思维是物理的,由功能神经回路进行;(b)使思维有意义的是这些神经回路与身体连接的方式,并描绘出具身经验;(c)所谓的抽象概念也是以这种方式体现的,语言也是如此。具身认知的实验结果不仅被视为证实了 NTTL,而且通过 NTTL 得到了解释,主要是通过概念隐喻的神经理论。三十多年前,那种认为认知使用没有实体的抽象符号进行操作的旧观念已经被抛弃,这些符号本身没有意义,但在没有身体和大脑的严重干预下,它们以某种方式构成了“外部现实的内部表现”。本文独特地解释了自那时以来具身认知结果与认知语言学、实验心理学、计算建模和神经科学之间的联系。