Suppr超能文献

对医生信任度的评估:测量方法的系统综述

Assessment of trust in physician: a systematic review of measures.

作者信息

Müller Evamaria, Zill Jördis M, Dirmaier Jörg, Härter Martin, Scholl Isabelle

机构信息

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Medical Psychology, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 10;9(9):e106844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106844. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Over the last decades, trust in physician has gained in importance. Studies have shown that trust in physician is associated with positive health behaviors in patients. However, the validity of empirical findings fundamentally depends on the quality of the measures in use. Our aim was to provide an overview of trust in physician measures and to evaluate the methodological quality of the psychometric studies and the quality of psychometric properties of identified measures. We conducted an electronic search in three databases (Medline, EMBASE and PsycInfo). The secondary search strategy included reference and citation tracking of included full texts and consultation of experts in the field. Retrieved records were screened independently by two reviewers. Full texts that reported on testing of psychometric properties of trust in physician measures were included in the review. Study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted. We evaluated the quality of design, methods and reporting of studies with the COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of psychometric properties was assessed with Terwee's 2007 quality criteria. After screening 3284 records and assessing 169 full texts for eligibility, fourteen studies on seven trust in physician measures were included. Most of the studies were conducted in the USA and used English measures. All but one measure were generic. Sample sizes range from 25 to 1199 participants, recruited in very heterogeneous settings. Quality assessments revealed several flaws in the methodological quality of studies. COSMIN scores were mainly fair or poor. The overall quality of measures' psychometric properties was intermediate. Several trust in physician measures have been developed over the last years, but further psychometric evaluation of these measures is strongly recommended. The methodological quality of psychometric property studies could be improved by adhering to quality criteria like the COSMIN checklist.

摘要

在过去几十年里,对医生的信任变得愈发重要。研究表明,对医生的信任与患者的积极健康行为相关。然而,实证研究结果的有效性从根本上取决于所使用测量方法的质量。我们的目的是概述对医生信任的测量方法,并评估心理测量学研究的方法学质量以及所识别测量方法的心理测量特性质量。我们在三个数据库(Medline、EMBASE和PsycInfo)中进行了电子检索。二次检索策略包括对纳入全文的参考文献和引用追踪以及咨询该领域的专家。检索到的记录由两名评审员独立筛选。报告了对医生信任测量方法心理测量特性测试的全文纳入综述。提取了研究特征和心理测量特性。我们使用基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估研究的设计、方法和报告质量。心理测量特性的质量根据特韦2007年的质量标准进行评估。在筛选了3284条记录并评估了169篇全文的合格性后,纳入了关于七种对医生信任测量方法的十四项研究。大多数研究在美国进行,使用的是英文测量方法。除一项测量方法外,其他所有测量方法都是通用的。样本量从25名到1199名参与者不等,招募背景非常多样化。质量评估揭示了研究方法学质量中的几个缺陷。COSMIN评分主要为中等或较差。测量方法心理测量特性的总体质量为中等。在过去几年中已经开发了几种对医生信任的测量方法,但强烈建议对这些测量方法进行进一步的心理测量评估。遵循COSMIN清单等质量标准可以提高心理测量特性研究的方法学质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb1c/4160203/c35449ca4521/pone.0106844.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验