• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信度在肿瘤学家量表(TiOS)的英文版本的验证。

Validation of the English version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.004
PMID:23219483
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS) was recently developed and validated in The Netherlands to assess cancer patients' trust in their oncologist. In this study, we translated and further validated the scale amongst English-speaking Australian cancer patients, to establish cross-cultural validity.

METHODS

The translated 18-item scale was administered to cancer patients (n = 175) from three Sydney hospitals. In addition to trust, we assessed patients' satisfaction, trust in health care, and background characteristics. Dimensionality, internal consistency, and construct validity of the translated scale were assessed.

RESULTS

Psychometric properties of all items were acceptable. Trust scores were very high. Factor analyses indicated one-dimensionality of the scale. Internal consistency was strong. Moderate to high correlations were found between trust (TiOS) and its known correlates, i.e., satisfaction, number of previous consultations with the oncologist, and trust in health care, indicating good construct validity.

CONCLUSION

Trust is highly coherent, suggesting that cancer patients do not distinguish between separate dimensions of trust. Future research could clarify if trust is equally strong and one-dimensional among specific groups of cancer patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Both the English and the Dutch Trust in Oncologist Scales appear suitable for assessing cancer patients' trust reliably and validly.

摘要

目的

信任肿瘤学家量表(TiOS)最近在荷兰开发并验证,用于评估癌症患者对肿瘤学家的信任。本研究旨在将该量表翻译成英文,并在澳大利亚英语癌症患者中进一步验证,以建立跨文化有效性。

方法

该翻译后的 18 项量表由悉尼的 3 家医院的癌症患者(n=175)完成。除了信任之外,我们还评估了患者的满意度、对医疗保健的信任以及背景特征。评估了翻译量表的维度、内部一致性和结构有效性。

结果

所有项目的心理测量特性均可以接受。信任评分非常高。因子分析表明该量表具有一维性。内部一致性较强。信任(TiOS)与其已知相关因素(即满意度、与肿瘤学家的咨询次数以及对医疗保健的信任)之间存在中度到高度相关性,表明具有良好的结构有效性。

结论

信任是高度一致的,这表明癌症患者不会区分信任的不同维度。未来的研究可以阐明在特定癌症患者群体中,信任是否同样强烈且具有一维性。

实践意义

英语和荷兰语的信任肿瘤学家量表似乎都适合可靠且有效地评估癌症患者的信任。

相似文献

1
Validation of the English version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).信度在肿瘤学家量表(TiOS)的英文版本的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
3
Validation of the Italian version of the full and abbreviated Trust in Oncologist Scale.验证完整和简化的信任肿瘤学家量表的意大利语版本。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13334. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13334. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Patients' trust in their physician--psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the "Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale".患者对医生的信任——“维克森林医生信任量表”荷兰语版的心理测量学特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.020. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
6
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
7
Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.《颈痛疾患指数量表(意大利语版)的研制:跨文化调适、因子分析、信度、效度及对变化的敏感性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1038-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182579795.
8
Development of a scale to measure patients' trust in health insurers.用于衡量患者对健康保险公司信任度的量表的开发。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):187-202.
9
The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire cross-cultural adaptation into Dutch and evaluation of its psychometric properties in a population with subacute and chronic whiplash associated disorders.《伯恩茅斯颈部问卷》的跨文化适应性在亚急性和慢性与挥鞭样损伤相关疾病人群中的心理测量学特性评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2551-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b318c4.
10
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations.用于评估肿瘤学家会诊的日本版患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ-J)的有效性和可靠性。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 18;2:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Antecedents, Consequences, and the Role of Third Parties in the Trust Repair Process: Evidence Taken from Orthodontics.
信任修复过程中的前因、后果及第三方的作用:来自正畸学的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;10(10):1811. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101811.
4
Italian onco-haematological patients' preferences in bad news communication: a preliminary investigation.意大利肿瘤血液病患者对不良消息沟通的偏好:初步调查。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 17;21(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08181-0.
5
Patient factors associated with discrepancies between patient-reported and clinician-documented peripheral neuropathy in women with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel: A pilot study.与接受紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌女性患者报告的周围神经病变与临床医生记录的周围神经病变之间的差异相关的患者因素:一项试点研究。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Offspring Cancer Needs Instrument (OCNI).波斯语版子代癌症需求量表(OCNI)的心理测量学特性
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jun 25;19(6):1621-1626. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.6.1621.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Version of “Spiritual Needs Questionnaire” for Cancer Patients in Iran: A Methodological Study.伊朗癌症患者“精神需求问卷”波斯语版本的心理测量学特性:一项方法学研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Apr 25;19(4):989-995. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.4.989.
9
A randomized controlled trial of a skills training for oncologists and a communication aid for patients to stimulate shared decision making about palliative systemic treatment (CHOICE): study protocol.一项针对肿瘤学家技能培训和患者沟通辅助工具的随机对照试验,以促进姑息性全身治疗的共同决策(CHOICE):研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3838-8.
10
Development of an instrument evaluating the impact of surgeon-patient relationship in patients on sick leave.一种评估医患关系对病假患者影响的工具的开发。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Aug 11;5(1):1345586. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1345586. eCollection 2017.