Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激可区分前额叶和顶叶在任务准备中的作用。

Transcranial magnetic stimulation dissociates prefrontal and parietal contributions to task preparation.

作者信息

Muhle-Karbe Paul S, Andres Michael, Brass Marcel

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2014 Sep 10;34(37):12481-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4931-13.2014.

Abstract

Cognitive control is thought to rely upon a set of distributed brain regions within frontoparietal cortex, but the functional contributions of these regions remain elusive. Here, we investigated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human prefrontal and parietal cortices in task preparation at different abstraction levels. While participants completed a task-switching paradigm that assessed the reconfiguration of task goals and response sets independently, TMS was applied over the left inferior frontal junction (IFJ) and over the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) during task preparation. In Experiment 1, TMS over the IFJ caused interference with the updating of task goals, while leaving the updating of response sets unaffected. In Experiment 2, TMS over the IPS created the opposite pattern of results, perturbing only the ability to update response sets, but not task goals. Experiment 3 furthermore revealed that TMS over the IPS interfered with task goal updating when the pulses are delivered at a later point in time during preparation. This dissociation of abstract and action-related components not only reveals distinct cognitive control processes during task preparation, but also sheds new light on how prefrontal and parietal areas might work in concert to support flexible and goal-oriented control of behavior.

摘要

认知控制被认为依赖于前额顶叶皮层内一组分布广泛的脑区,但其功能贡献仍不明确。在此,我们研究了经颅磁刺激(TMS)作用于人类前额叶和顶叶皮层对不同抽象水平任务准备的干扰效应。当参与者完成一个任务切换范式时,该范式独立评估任务目标和反应集的重新配置,在任务准备期间,TMS施加于左侧额下回交界处(IFJ)和左侧顶内沟(IPS)。在实验1中,IFJ上的TMS对任务目标的更新产生干扰,而对反应集的更新没有影响。在实验2中,IPS上的TMS产生了相反的结果模式,仅干扰了反应集的更新能力,而不影响任务目标。实验3进一步表明,当在准备过程中较晚的时间点施加脉冲时,IPS上的TMS会干扰任务目标的更新。这种抽象成分与动作相关成分的分离不仅揭示了任务准备期间不同的认知控制过程,还为前额叶和顶叶区域如何协同工作以支持灵活且目标导向的行为控制提供了新的线索。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

3
A role for the claustrum in cognitive control.屏状核在认知控制中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Dec;26(12):1133-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.主动编码过程中新颖任务集的表象组织。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8386-8397. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural mechanisms of object-based attention.基于对象的注意力的神经机制。
Science. 2014 Apr 25;344(6182):424-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1247003. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
2
Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory.重新探讨工作记忆期间持续神经活动的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Feb;18(2):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验