Muhle-Karbe Paul S, Andres Michael, Brass Marcel
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
J Neurosci. 2014 Sep 10;34(37):12481-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4931-13.2014.
Cognitive control is thought to rely upon a set of distributed brain regions within frontoparietal cortex, but the functional contributions of these regions remain elusive. Here, we investigated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human prefrontal and parietal cortices in task preparation at different abstraction levels. While participants completed a task-switching paradigm that assessed the reconfiguration of task goals and response sets independently, TMS was applied over the left inferior frontal junction (IFJ) and over the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) during task preparation. In Experiment 1, TMS over the IFJ caused interference with the updating of task goals, while leaving the updating of response sets unaffected. In Experiment 2, TMS over the IPS created the opposite pattern of results, perturbing only the ability to update response sets, but not task goals. Experiment 3 furthermore revealed that TMS over the IPS interfered with task goal updating when the pulses are delivered at a later point in time during preparation. This dissociation of abstract and action-related components not only reveals distinct cognitive control processes during task preparation, but also sheds new light on how prefrontal and parietal areas might work in concert to support flexible and goal-oriented control of behavior.
认知控制被认为依赖于前额顶叶皮层内一组分布广泛的脑区,但其功能贡献仍不明确。在此,我们研究了经颅磁刺激(TMS)作用于人类前额叶和顶叶皮层对不同抽象水平任务准备的干扰效应。当参与者完成一个任务切换范式时,该范式独立评估任务目标和反应集的重新配置,在任务准备期间,TMS施加于左侧额下回交界处(IFJ)和左侧顶内沟(IPS)。在实验1中,IFJ上的TMS对任务目标的更新产生干扰,而对反应集的更新没有影响。在实验2中,IPS上的TMS产生了相反的结果模式,仅干扰了反应集的更新能力,而不影响任务目标。实验3进一步表明,当在准备过程中较晚的时间点施加脉冲时,IPS上的TMS会干扰任务目标的更新。这种抽象成分与动作相关成分的分离不仅揭示了任务准备期间不同的认知控制过程,还为前额叶和顶叶区域如何协同工作以支持灵活且目标导向的行为控制提供了新的线索。