• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声龈上洁治术中疼痛主观强度的评估:一项对比研究。

Assessment of subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal: A comparative study.

作者信息

Malagi Sachin, Pattanshetti Kirti, Bharmappa Radhika, Reddy Annaji Sreedhara, Pai Jagadish, Joseph Rosemary

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.

Padmashree Dr. D Y Patil Dental College, Nerul, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jul;18(4):472-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.138698.

DOI:10.4103/0972-124X.138698
PMID:25210262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4158589/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The background of the following study is to measure the subjective intensity of pain using the verbal rating scale (VRS) during supragingival scaling in relation to mandibular anteriors, with an ultrasonic scaler, with 2 different inserts (Slimline and Focus spray)- split mouth study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 subjects with a combination of 17 males and 13 females with the chronic generalized gingivitis with a minimum calculus score of 1 (CSSI - Ennever J 1961) who reported to Department of Periodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore were chosen for the study. Ultrasonic magnetostrictive scaler unit CAVITRON BOBCAT PRO(®)- (DENTSPLY) with maximum power setting at 130A and 25kHZ frequency with 2 different inserts i.e., Slim line insert and Focus spray (DENTSPLY) were used for supragingival scaling in the study. A VRS was used to assess the subjective intensity of pain.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in pain perception when the scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. VRS rating scores with slimline inserts showed a pain intensity of 2 in 43.3%, 1 in 53.3% and 0 in 3.3%, whereas the focus spray insert showed a pain intensity of 1 in 23.3% and 0 in 76.7%. Statistical analysis showed a P = 0.251 and a z - 1.147(a).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of both Slim line insert and Focus spray inserts when used at same settings of the scaling unit, showed no statistical significant difference in the intensity of pain perceived and it showed no correlation between patient acceptance and their pain perception.

摘要

背景

以下研究的背景是,在使用超声洁牙机对上颌前牙进行龈上洁治时,使用语言评定量表(VRS)测量疼痛的主观强度,该超声洁牙机配有2种不同的工作尖(Slimline和Focus spray)——采用双盲法研究。

材料与方法

共有30名受试者入选本研究,其中男性17名,女性13名,均患有慢性广泛性牙龈炎,牙结石评分最低为1分(CSSI - Ennever J 1961),这些受试者来自芒格洛尔耶内波亚牙科学院牙周病科。研究中使用超声磁致伸缩洁牙机CAVITRON BOBCAT PRO(®)-(登士柏公司),最大功率设置为130A,频率为25kHz,配有2种不同的工作尖,即Slimline工作尖和Focus spray工作尖(登士柏公司)进行龈上洁治。使用VRS评估疼痛的主观强度。

结果

使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较得分时,疼痛感知方面无统计学显著差异。使用Slimline工作尖时,VRS评分显示疼痛强度为2分的占43.3%,为1分的占53.3%,为0分的占3.3%;而使用Focus spray工作尖时,疼痛强度为1分的占23.3%,为0分的占76.7%。统计分析显示P = 0.251,z = - 1.147(a)。

结论

在洁治设备相同设置下使用Slimline工作尖和Focus spray工作尖时,所感知的疼痛强度无统计学显著差异,且患者接受度与疼痛感知之间无相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/99301076f448/JISP-18-472-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/72ff4303a950/JISP-18-472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/8ffbdfb3f04a/JISP-18-472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/feb534e764c9/JISP-18-472-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/f3062d1df7d7/JISP-18-472-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/99301076f448/JISP-18-472-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/72ff4303a950/JISP-18-472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/8ffbdfb3f04a/JISP-18-472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/feb534e764c9/JISP-18-472-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/f3062d1df7d7/JISP-18-472-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dc/4158589/99301076f448/JISP-18-472-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal: A comparative study.超声龈上洁治术中疼痛主观强度的评估:一项对比研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jul;18(4):472-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.138698.
2
Subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal.超声龈上洁治过程中疼痛的主观强度
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Aug;34(8):668-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01100.x. Epub 2007 May 29.
3
A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy.一项随机对照试验,旨在比较磁性伸缩堆垛式洁牙器和压电式洁牙器在牙周支持治疗中对患者体验的影响。
J Dent. 2020 Feb;93:103279. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103279. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Effect of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics on pain perception during scaling by ultrasonic or hand instruments: a masked randomized controlled trial.局麻药混合物对超声或手动器械洁牙时疼痛感知的影响:一项盲法随机对照试验。
J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):259-66. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090748. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
5
A comparative questionnaire study of patient complaint levels between magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler (Cavitron ) and piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers.一种比较问卷研究患者投诉水平之间的磁致伸缩超声洁牙机( Cavitron )和压电超声洁牙机。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2021 Aug;19(3):273-278. doi: 10.1111/idh.12478. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
Influence of scaler tip design on root surface roughness, tooth substance loss and patients' pain perception: an in vitro and a randomised clinical trial.洁治器尖端设计对牙根表面粗糙度、牙体组织丧失及患者疼痛感知的影响:一项体外研究和一项随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01540-0.
7
Microscopic view of scaling influence on the root, using different power and time settings.使用不同功率和时间设置时,洁治对牙根影响的显微镜视图。
Quintessence Int. 2016;47(7):559-68. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a36094.
8
Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.洁治器尖端设计对超声洁治导致的牙根物质丧失的显著影响:一项激光轮廓测量法体外研究
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Nov;31(11):1003-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00601.x.
9
Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments.两种动力驱动器械在预防性治疗期间引发的疼痛。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):535-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00707.x.
10
Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.不同功率设置下磁致伸缩超声器械的清洁能力和诱导牙本质损耗。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):241-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between dental anxiety and pain perception during scaling.洗牙过程中牙科焦虑与疼痛感知之间的关系。
J Oral Sci. 2011 Sep;53(3):341-8. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.53.341.
2
Pain perception and anxiety during scaling in periodontally healthy subjects.牙周健康受试者在洁治过程中的疼痛感知与焦虑
J Periodontol. 2008 Dec;79(12):2247-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080152.
3
Subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal.超声龈上洁治过程中疼痛的主观强度
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Aug;34(8):668-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01100.x. Epub 2007 May 29.
4
Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments.两种动力驱动器械在预防性治疗期间引发的疼痛。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):535-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00707.x.
5
Recent concepts in plaque formation.斑块形成的最新概念。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30 Suppl 5:7-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.30.s5.3.x.
6
Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care.姑息治疗临床研究中的疼痛测量工具与方法:欧洲姑息治疗协会专家工作组的建议
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Mar;23(3):239-55. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00409-2.
7
Pain threshold values during periodontal probing: assessment of maxillary incisor and molar sites.
J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):812-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.812.
8
How patient compliance to suggested oral hygiene and maintenance affect periodontal therapy.患者对建议的口腔卫生和维护的依从性如何影响牙周治疗。
Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):389-403.
9
Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.不同洁治方式后的牙根表面纹理
Scand J Dent Res. 1994 Jun;102(3):156-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01172.x.
10
Control of supragingival calculus. Scaling and polishing and anticalculus toothpastes: an opinion.
J Clin Periodontol. 1994 May;21(5):342-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00723.x.