• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

息肉切除术的进展、问题及并发症

Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy.

作者信息

Anderloni Andrea, Jovani Manol, Hassan Cesare, Repici Alessandro

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 30;7:285-96. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S43084. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.2147/CEG.S43084
PMID:25210470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4155740/
Abstract

The major role of colonoscopy with polypectomy in reducing the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer has been firmly established. Yet there is cause to be uneasy. One of the most striking recent findings is that there is an alarmingly high incomplete polyp removal rate. This phenomenon, together with missed polyps during screening colonoscopy, is thought to be responsible for the majority of interval cancers. Knowledge of serrated polyps needs to broaden as well, since they are quite often missed or incompletely removed. Removal of small and diminutive polyps is almost devoid of complications. Cold snare polypectomy seems to be the best approach for these lesions, with biopsy forcep removal reserved only for the tiniest of polyps. Hot snare or hot biopsy forcep removal of these lesions is no longer recommended. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection have proven to be effective in the removal of large colorectal lesions, avoiding surgery in the majority of patients, with acceptably low complication rates. Variants of these approaches, as well as new hybrid techniques, are being currently tested. In this paper, we review the current status of the different approaches in removing polypoid and nonpolypoid lesions of the colon, their complications, and future directions in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

摘要

结肠镜下息肉切除术在降低结直肠癌发病率和死亡率方面的主要作用已得到确凿证实。然而,仍有理由感到不安。最近最引人注目的发现之一是息肉切除不完全率高得惊人。这种现象,连同筛查结肠镜检查时漏诊的息肉,被认为是大多数间隔期癌症的原因。对锯齿状息肉的认识也需要拓宽,因为它们经常被漏诊或切除不完全。切除小息肉和微小息肉几乎没有并发症。冷圈套息肉切除术似乎是处理这些病变的最佳方法,活检钳切除仅保留用于最小的息肉。不再推荐用热圈套器或热活检钳切除这些病变。内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术已被证明在切除大肠大病变方面有效,大多数患者可避免手术,并发症发生率可接受且较低。目前正在测试这些方法的变体以及新的联合技术。在本文中,我们综述了结肠息肉样和非息肉样病变不同切除方法的现状、它们的并发症以及预防结直肠癌的未来方向。

相似文献

1
Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy.息肉切除术的进展、问题及并发症
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 30;7:285-96. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S43084. eCollection 2014.
2
Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos).比较热圈套器、冷圈套器及冷活检钳息肉切除术对微小结直肠息肉的切除效果。一项单中心随机试验研究结果(附视频)
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Feb;3(1):E76-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390789. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
3
Complete endoscopic removal rate of detected colorectal polyps in a real world out-patient practical setting.在真实世界的门诊实际环境中检测到的结直肠息肉的完全内镜切除率。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr;58(4):422-428. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2132533. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.1-20mm 结直肠息肉不完全切除率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):904-914.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
Safety and efficacy of band ligation and auto-amputation as adjunct to EMR of colonic large laterally spreading tumors, and polyps not amenable to routine polypectomy.作为结肠大型侧向发育肿瘤及不适于常规息肉切除术的息肉内镜黏膜切除术辅助手段的套扎术和自动切除的安全性及有效性
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar 30;14:26317745211001750. doi: 10.1177/26317745211001750. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Cold versus hot polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection-A review of current evidence.冷切除与热切除息肉/内镜黏膜切除术——当前证据综述。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Oct;9(8):938-946. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12130. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
7
Cold snare polypectomy: Indications, devices, techniques, outcomes and future.冷圈套息肉切除术:适应证、器械、技术、结局和未来。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Jul;31(4):372-377. doi: 10.1111/den.13314. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
8
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
9
Can endoscopic submucosal dissection technique be an alternative treatment option for a difficult giant (≥ 30 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyp?内镜黏膜下剥离术技术可否作为一种治疗困难的(≥30mm)有蒂结直肠大息肉(瘤)的替代治疗选择?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):660-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318276d2b9.
10
Current standards and new developments of colorectal polyp management and resection techniques.结直肠息肉管理与切除技术的当前标准及新进展
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;11(9):835-842. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1309279. Epub 2017 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete closure utilizing titanium clips minimizes delayed postpolypectomy bleeding after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection: a retrospective analysis.使用钛夹完全闭合可将结直肠内镜黏膜切除术后延迟出血降至最低:一项回顾性分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23;18:17562848251332836. doi: 10.1177/17562848251332836. eCollection 2025.
2
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is superior to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for medium-sized colorectal sessile polyps: a randomized controlled trial.水下内镜黏膜切除术治疗中等大小结直肠无蒂息肉优于传统内镜黏膜切除术:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81817-w.
3
Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks.用于处理大肠大息肉、狭窄和瘘的内镜技术。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jul 4;20:156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.06.012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Safety of cold resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.非壶腹十二指肠息肉冷切除术的安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jun 6;12(6):E732-E739. doi: 10.1055/a-2306-6535. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
The Utility of Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification in Predicting the Histologies of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using I-Scan Optical Enhancement: A Prospective Study.窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类联合I-Scan光学增强技术预测微小结直肠息肉组织学类型的效用:一项前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;13(16):2720. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162720.
6
Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection.使用常规黏膜下注射的宽视野冷圈套切除术时,4至20毫米无蒂结直肠息肉的不完全切除率
Endosc Int Open. 2023 May 17;11(5):E480-E489. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-2392. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Colo-colonic intussusception with post-polypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome: A case report.结肠-结肠套叠伴息肉切除术后电凝综合征:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Sep 6;10(25):8939-8944. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8939.
8
Modified endoscopic mucosal resection techniques for treating precancerous colorectal lesions.改良内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠癌前病变的技术
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):757-769. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0647. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
The quality of colorectal polypectomy. Is it enough to have just a visual assessment of the site?结直肠息肉切除术的质量。仅仅对切除部位进行目视评估是否足够?
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020 Oct-Dec;61(4):1301-1307. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.4.31.
10
Improving Colonoscopy Lesion Classification Using Semi-Supervised Deep Learning.使用半监督深度学习改进结肠镜检查病变分类
IEEE Access. 2021;9:631-640. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3047544. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

本文引用的文献

1
New technique of en bloc resection of colorectal tumor using laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperatively (laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery - colorectal).腹腔镜与内镜联合整块切除结直肠肿瘤新技术(腹腔镜与内镜联合结直肠切除术)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):267-71. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000049.
2
Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos).内镜黏膜下剥离术后用内镜缝合封闭大的黏膜缺损在技术上是可行的,快速的,并且消除了住院的需要(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.051. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
3
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe.经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3297-5.
4
The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study.威尔士微创治疗内镜训练箱在结肠镜息肉切除术技能培训中具有结构和同时效度:一项前瞻性、横断面研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection-therapy failure?内镜黏膜切除术后复发-治疗失败?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;29(2):209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1783-9. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.抗凝治疗患者中小肠息肉切除术:冷圈套与传统息肉切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
7
Mini-probe ultrasonography for the staging of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微型探头超声检查在结肠癌分期中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jan;16(1):O1-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12445.
8
Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌筛查后的长期死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1106-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300720.
9
Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷活检钳息肉切除术联合双活检技术用于切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.息肉切除术后结肠镜检查监测:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2013 Oct;45(10):842-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344548. Epub 2013 Sep 12.