• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用研究证据重新构建围绕精神疾病与枪支的政策辩论:过程与建议

Using research evidence to reframe the policy debate around mental illness and guns: process and recommendations.

作者信息

McGinty Emma E, Frattaroli Shannon, Appelbaum Paul S, Bonnie Richard J, Grilley Anna, Horwitz Joshua, Swanson Jeffrey W, Webster Daniel W

机构信息

Emma E. McGinty, Shannon Frattaroli, and Daniel W. Webster are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Paul S. Appelbaum is with the Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY. Richard J. Bonnie is with the Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville. Anna Grilley is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Joshua Horwitz is with the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence, Washington, DC. Jeffrey W. Swanson is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e22-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302171. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302171
PMID:25211757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4202989/
Abstract

Recent mass shootings have prompted a national dialogue around mental illness and gun policy. To advance an evidence-informed policy agenda on this controversial issue, we formed a consortium of national gun violence prevention and mental health experts. The consortium agreed on a guiding principle for future policy recommendations: restricting firearm access on the basis of certain dangerous behaviors is supported by the evidence; restricting access on the basis of mental illness diagnoses is not. We describe the group's process and recommendations.

摘要

近期发生的大规模枪击事件引发了一场关于精神疾病和枪支政策的全国性讨论。为了在这个有争议的问题上推进基于证据的政策议程,我们组建了一个由全国枪支暴力预防和心理健康专家组成的联盟。该联盟就未来政策建议的指导原则达成了一致:有证据支持基于某些危险行为限制枪支获取;而基于精神疾病诊断限制获取则没有证据支持。我们描述了该小组的过程和建议。

相似文献

1
Using research evidence to reframe the policy debate around mental illness and guns: process and recommendations.利用研究证据重新构建围绕精神疾病与枪支的政策辩论:过程与建议
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e22-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302171. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy.精神疾病与减少枪支暴力和自杀:将流行病学研究应用于政策制定
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 May;25(5):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
3
Guns, Mental Illness, and the Law: Introduction to This Issue.枪支、精神疾病与法律:本期引言
Behav Sci Law. 2015 Jun;33(2-3):167-77. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2178. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Gun violence: psychiatry, risk assessment, and social policy.枪支暴力:精神病学、风险评估与社会政策。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(3):337-43.
5
Mental Illness and Firearms: Legal Context and Clinical Approaches.精神疾病与枪支:法律背景及临床方法
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;39(4):611-621. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
6
Mass Shootings, Mental Illness, and Gun Control.大规模枪击事件、精神疾病与枪支管制。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Mar;48(2):7-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.832.
7
News media framing of serious mental illness and gun violence in the United States, 1997-2012.1997-2012 年美国新闻媒体对严重精神疾病与枪支暴力的报道框架。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):406-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301557. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
8
Effects of policies designed to keep firearms from high-risk individuals.旨在将枪支与高风险个体隔离开来的政策的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:21-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122516. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Effects of news media messages about mass shootings on attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness and public support for gun control policies.关于大规模枪击事件的新闻媒体信息对人们对患有严重精神疾病者的态度和对枪支管制政策的公众支持的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 May;170(5):494-501. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13010014.
10
The Link Between Mental Illness and Firearm Violence: Implications for Social Policy and Clinical Practice.精神疾病与枪支暴力之间的联系:对社会政策和临床实践的启示
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:445-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093459. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Arrests Among Extreme Risk Protection Order Respondents in Washington State: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.华盛顿州极端风险保护令受访者中的逮捕情况:一项全州范围的回顾性队列研究。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251349717. doi: 10.1177/00469580251349717. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Mental Health Treatment Access: Experience, Hypotheticals, and Public Opinion.心理健康治疗的可及性:经验、假设与公众意见
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):100-129. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12726. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
Balancing the Roles of Clinicians and Police in Separating Firearms from People in a Dangerous Mental Health Crisis: Legal Rules, Policy Tools, and Ethical Considerations.平衡临床医生和警察在精神健康危机中从危险人群中收缴枪支的角色:法律规则、政策工具和伦理考量。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):93-103. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.44. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Advocacy, activism, and lobbying: How variations in interpretation affects ability for academia to engage with public policy.倡导、行动主义与游说:解读方式的差异如何影响学术界参与公共政策的能力。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;2(3):e0000034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000034. eCollection 2022.
5
Simulating the bounds of plausibility: Estimating the impact of high-risk versus population-based approaches to prevent firearm injury.模拟可信范围:估计采用高风险与基于人群的方法预防枪支伤害的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 2;17(6):e0269372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269372. eCollection 2022.
6
Extreme risk protection orders in King County, Washington: the epidemiology of dangerous behaviors and an intervention response.华盛顿州金县的极端风险保护令:危险行为的流行病学及干预应对措施
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00270-1.
7
Malpractice Liability Due to Patient Violence.患者暴力导致的医疗事故责任
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):343-348. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190022. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Simulating the Suicide Prevention Effects of Firearms Restrictions Based on Psychiatric Hospitalization and Treatment Records: Social Benefits and Unintended Adverse Consequences.基于精神病院住院和治疗记录模拟枪支限制的预防自杀效果:社会效益和意外的不良后果。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jun;109(S3):S236-S243. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305041.
9
The Importance of Policy Change for Addressing Public Health Problems.政策变革对解决公共卫生问题的重要性。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov/Dec;133(1_suppl):9S-14S. doi: 10.1177/0033354918788880.
10
Expanding the Public Health Approach to Gun Violence Prevention.扩大预防枪支暴力的公共卫生方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):723-724. doi: 10.7326/M18-2846. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy.精神疾病与减少枪支暴力和自杀:将流行病学研究应用于政策制定
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 May;25(5):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
2
Gun policy and serious mental illness: priorities for future research and policy.枪支政策与严重精神疾病:未来研究和政策的优先事项。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):50-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300141.
3
Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.改变枪支的宪法格局:美国最高法院最近的第二修正案裁决。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2021-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300200. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
4
Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities.美国大城市中家庭暴力政策、酒精税和警察人员配置水平对亲密伴侣杀人案的影响。
Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;16(2):90-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.024620.
5
Criminal records of homicide offenders.杀人罪犯的犯罪记录。
JAMA. 2005 Aug 3;294(5):598-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.5.598.
6
Subsequent criminal activity among violent misdemeanants who seek to purchase handguns: risk factors and effectiveness of denying handgun purchase.试图购买手枪的暴力轻罪者随后的犯罪活动:风险因素及拒绝手枪购买的有效性
JAMA. 2001 Feb 28;285(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.8.1019.
7
Risk factors for violent death of women in the home.家中女性暴力死亡的风险因素。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Apr 14;157(7):777-82.
8
Personality traits and behaviors of alcohol-impaired drivers: a comparison of first and multiple offenders.酒精影响下驾驶者的人格特质与行为:初犯者与多次 offenders 的比较。(注:这里“offenders”直接保留英文,因为没有更准确对应的中文词汇,结合语境推测是指多次违法驾驶者之类的意思)
Addict Behav. 1992 Sep-Oct;17(5):407-14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90001-c.