Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Mar;48(2):7-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.832.
In the wake of the Stoneman Douglas School shooting, Republican and Democratic leaders-like the American electorate they represent-remain sharply divided in their responses to gun violence. They are united in their condemnation of these mass shootings, but they disagree about whether stricter or looser gun control laws are the answer. Those on the right side of the political aisle suggest that the issue is one of mental illness rather than gun control. Conversely, those who are more liberal or progressive in their political learnings are quick to condemn attempts to reframe the issue of mass shootings as a mental health problem. Both sides are wrong. Mass shootings are indeed partially a mental health problem, albeit one poorly addressed by our current laws and policies. But the solution to mass shootings also needs to consider strategies that may reduce gun violence in general.
在史通顿道格拉斯学校枪击事件发生后,共和党和民主党领导人——就像他们所代表的美国选民一样——在应对枪支暴力的问题上仍然存在严重分歧。他们一致谴责这些大规模枪击事件,但对于更严格还是更宽松的枪支管制法是否是解决办法存在分歧。政治走廊右侧的人认为,这个问题是精神疾病而不是枪支管制的问题。相反,那些在政治学习上更加自由或进步的人则迅速谴责试图将大规模枪击事件重新定义为精神健康问题的企图。双方都错了。大规模枪击事件确实部分是一个精神健康问题,尽管我们目前的法律和政策对此问题的处理不力。但是,解决大规模枪击事件的方法还需要考虑可能减少一般枪支暴力的策略。