Sun Jie, Zhao Xue-Qiao, Balu Niranjan, Hippe Daniel S, Hatsukami Thomas S, Isquith Daniel A, Yamada Kiyofumi, Neradilek Moni B, Cantón Gádor, Xue Yunjing, Fleg Jerome L, Desvigne-Nickens Patrice, Klimas Michael T, Padley Robert J, Vassileva Maria T, Wyman Bradley T, Yuan Chun
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 850 Republican St Brotman 127, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA,
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;31(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0532-7. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
This study sought to determine the multicenter reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the compatibility of different scanner platforms in assessing carotid plaque morphology and composition. A standardized multi-contrast MRI protocol was implemented at 16 imaging sites (GE: 8; Philips: 8). Sixty-eight subjects (61 ± 8 years; 52 males) were dispersedly recruited and scanned twice within 2 weeks on the same magnet. Images were reviewed centrally using a streamlined semiautomatic approach. Quantitative volumetric measurements on plaque morphology (lumen, wall, and outer wall) and plaque tissue composition [lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), calcification, and fibrous tissue] were obtained. Inter-scan reproducibility was summarized using the within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Good to excellent reproducibility was observed for both morphological (ICC range 0.98-0.99) and compositional (ICC range 0.88-0.96) measurements. Measurement precision was related to the size of structures (CV range 2.5-4.9 % for morphology, 36-44 % for LRNC and calcification). Comparable measurement variability was found between the two platforms on both plaque morphology and tissue composition. In conclusion, good to excellent inter-scan reproducibility of carotid MRI can be achieved in multicenter settings with comparable measurement precision between platforms, which may facilitate future multicenter endeavors that use serial MRI to monitor atherosclerotic plaque progression.
本研究旨在确定磁共振成像(MRI)在多中心的可重复性以及不同扫描仪平台在评估颈动脉斑块形态和成分方面的兼容性。在16个成像站点(通用电气:8个;飞利浦:8个)实施了标准化的多对比MRI方案。分散招募了68名受试者(61±8岁;52名男性),并在2周内于同一磁体上进行了两次扫描。使用简化的半自动方法对图像进行集中审查。获得了斑块形态(管腔、管壁和外壁)和斑块组织成分[富含脂质的坏死核心(LRNC)、钙化和纤维组织]的定量体积测量结果。使用受试者内标准差、变异系数(CV)和组内相关系数(ICC)总结扫描间的可重复性。形态学测量(ICC范围为0.98 - 0.99)和成分测量(ICC范围为0.88 - 0.96)均观察到良好至优秀的可重复性。测量精度与结构大小有关(形态学的CV范围为2.5 - 4.9%,LRNC和钙化的CV范围为36 - 44%)。在斑块形态和组织成分方面,两个平台之间发现了可比的测量变异性。总之,在多中心环境中可以实现颈动脉MRI良好至优秀的扫描间可重复性,且平台间具有可比的测量精度,这可能有助于未来使用系列MRI监测动脉粥样硬化斑块进展的多中心研究。