Bovenzi Massimo, Schust Marianne, Menzel Gerhard, Prodi Andrea, Mauro Marcella
Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Centro Tumori, Via della Pietà 19, 34129, Trieste, Italy,
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 May;88(4):487-99. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0976-z. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
To investigate the relationships between low back symptoms and alternative measures of external dose and internal spinal dose in professional drivers exposed to whole body vibration (WBV).
The occurrence of low back symptoms was investigated in a cohort of 537 drivers over a 2-year follow-up period. Low back pain (LBP), individual characteristics, and work-related risk factors were investigated with a structured questionnaire. Exposure to WBV was evaluated by means of measures of external dose (daily vibration exposure in terms of either equivalent continuous acceleration over an 8-h period (A(8)) or vibration dose value according to the EU Directive on mechanical vibration) and measures of internal lumbar load (daily compressive dose S ed and risk factor R according to ISO/CD 2631-5 2014).
In the drivers' cohort, the cumulative incidence of 12-month low back outcomes was 16.8% for LBP, 9.3% for chronic LBP, and 21.8% for sciatic pain. The measures of internal spinal load were better predictors of the occurrence of low back symptoms than the measures of daily vibration exposure. A twofold increase in the risk estimates for low back outcomes was found in the upper quartile of the R factor (0.41-0.72 units) compared to the lower one (0.07-0.19 units).
In this prospective cohort study, measures of internal spinal dose performed better than measures of daily vibration exposure (external dose) for the prediction of low back outcomes in professional drivers. The ISO boundary values of the risk factor R for low and high probabilities of adverse health effects on the lumbar spine tend to underestimate the health risk in professional drivers.
研究职业驾驶员在全身振动(WBV)环境下,腰痛症状与外部剂量及脊柱内部剂量替代指标之间的关系。
在537名驾驶员队列中进行了为期2年的随访,调查腰痛症状的发生情况。通过结构化问卷调查腰痛(LBP)、个体特征和工作相关风险因素。采用外部剂量指标(8小时等效连续加速度(A(8))或根据欧盟机械振动指令的振动剂量值)和腰椎内部负荷指标(根据ISO/CD 2631-5 2014的每日压缩剂量Sed和风险因子R)评估WBV暴露情况。
在驾驶员队列中,12个月腰痛结局的累积发病率分别为:LBP为16.8%,慢性LBP为9.3%,坐骨神经痛为21.8%。脊柱内部负荷指标比每日振动暴露指标更能预测腰痛症状的发生。与R因子较低四分位数(0.07 - 0.19单位)相比,较高四分位数(0.41 - 0.72单位)的腰痛结局风险估计值增加了两倍。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,对于预测职业驾驶员的腰痛结局,脊柱内部剂量指标比每日振动暴露(外部剂量)指标表现更好。腰椎对健康产生不良影响的低概率和高概率情况下,风险因子R的ISO边界值往往低估了职业驾驶员的健康风险。