Fischer Kai R, Stavropoulos Andreas, Calvo-Guirado José-Luis, Schneider David, Fickl Stefan
Department of Periodontology, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Periodontology Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1135-42. doi: 10.1111/clr.12483. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
To evaluate the influence of local administration of pamidronate histomorphometrically, adsorbed on a collagenated porcine bone substitute, on extraction socket healing.
Two American Fox-hound dogs were used within this proof-of-principle study. Following endodontic treatment of the distal root of the three lower premolars, the teeth were hemisected, and the mesial roots were extracted flapless. The sockets were then loosely filled, in a split-mouth fashion, with a collagenated porcine bone substitute (Osteobiol Gen-Os; CPB), rehydrated either with 90 mg/ml pamidronate (Aredia(®) ; test) or with sterile saline (control). Extraction sockets were sealed with connective tissue punches obtained from the palate and secured with sutures. After 4 months of healing, specimens containing the socket sites and remaining roots were retrieved and histomorphometrically examined.
Histological evaluation of the sections revealed substantial differences in healing patterns. Control sites presented with various amounts of newly formed bone and no evidence of CPB inside the socket; in contrast, limited amounts of bone were observed at test sites, which were filled with CPB mainly embedded in connective tissue. Only minor differences were observed between test and control sites regarding vertical bone loss (buccal bone: -1.01 mm vs. -1.15 mm; lingual bone: -0.92 mm vs. -1.15 mm). Horizontal bone loss was nearly three times higher in control sites comparing to sites treated with pamidronate (-2.19 ± 1.81 mm vs. -0.80 ± 0.91 mm) at a level corresponding to 3 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
Local administration of pamidronate adsorbed on a collagenated porcine bone substitute in particulate form appeared to delay extraction socket healing, but may also reduce post-extraction dimensional changes in terms of horizontal bone width. Additionally, pamidronate appears to obstruct resorption of the porcine bone substitute.
通过组织形态计量学评估吸附在胶原猪骨替代物上的帕米膦酸盐局部给药对拔牙窝愈合的影响。
在这项原理验证研究中使用了两只美国猎狐犬。对三颗下前磨牙的远中根进行根管治疗后,将牙齿对半切开,无瓣拔除近中根。然后以分口方式用胶原猪骨替代物(Osteobiol Gen - Os;CPB)松散填充拔牙窝,该替代物用90mg/ml帕米膦酸盐(阿仑膦酸钠;试验组)或无菌盐水(对照组)复水。用从腭部获取的结缔组织打孔器封闭拔牙窝并用缝线固定。愈合4个月后,取出包含拔牙窝部位和剩余牙根的标本并进行组织形态计量学检查。
切片的组织学评估显示愈合模式存在显著差异。对照组出现不同量的新形成骨组织,拔牙窝内无CPB迹象;相比之下,试验组观察到少量骨组织,拔牙窝内填充有主要嵌入结缔组织的CPB。试验组和对照组在垂直骨吸收方面仅观察到微小差异(颊侧骨:-1.01mm对-1.15mm;舌侧骨:-0.92mm对-1.15mm)。在对应于牙骨质 - 釉质界(CEJ)下方3mm水平处,对照组的水平骨吸收比用帕米膦酸盐处理的部位高近三倍(-2.19±1.81mm对-0.80±0.91mm)。
以颗粒形式吸附在胶原猪骨替代物上的帕米膦酸盐局部给药似乎会延迟拔牙窝愈合,但也可能减少拔牙后水平骨宽度方面的尺寸变化。此外,帕米膦酸盐似乎会阻碍猪骨替代物的吸收。