Collins Charles R, Neal Jennifer Watling, Neal Zachary P
School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Box 358530, 18115 Campus Way NE, Bothell, WA, 98011-8246, USA,
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Dec;54(3-4):328-36. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9675-x.
Collective efficacy is defined as residents' perceived collective capacity to take coordinated and interdependent action on issues that affect their lives. This study explored factors associated with neighborhood collective efficacy among residents. Utilizing a national sample of 4,120 urban households provided by Annie E. Casey Foundation's Making Connection Initiative, we investigated the mediating role of residents' perceptions of bonding social capital (i.e. reciprocity, trust, and shared norms) in the association between civic engagement and collective efficacy. Multiple regression analyses revealed that civic engagement and bonding social capital were both directly related to collective efficacy. Additionally, bonding social capital partially mediated the relationship between civic engagement and collective efficacy. Specifically, residents who reported greater levels of civic engagement also reported higher levels of bonding social capital. In turn, residents who reported higher levels of bonding social capital also reported higher levels of neighborhood collective efficacy. We discuss implications of these findings for researchers and practitioners interested in associations of neighborhood collective efficacy.
集体效能被定义为居民对在影响其生活的问题上采取协调一致和相互依存行动的集体能力的感知。本研究探讨了居民邻里集体效能的相关因素。利用安妮·E·凯西基金会“建立联系倡议”提供的4120个城市家庭的全国样本,我们调查了居民对联结社会资本(即互惠、信任和共享规范)的认知在公民参与和集体效能之间关联中的中介作用。多元回归分析表明,公民参与和联结社会资本都与集体效能直接相关。此外,联结社会资本部分中介了公民参与和集体效能之间的关系。具体而言,报告公民参与水平较高的居民也报告了较高水平的联结社会资本。反过来,报告联结社会资本水平较高的居民也报告了较高水平的邻里集体效能。我们讨论了这些发现对关注邻里集体效能关联的研究人员和从业者的启示。