Cheng Wei-Chun, Chiu Yen-Cheng, Chuang Chiao-Hsiung, Chen Chiung-Yu
Department of Internal Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(9):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
The management of acute cholecystitis is still based on clinical expertise. This study aims to investigate whether the outcome of acute cholecystitis can be related to the severity criteria of the Tokyo guidelines and additional clinical comorbidities. A total of 103 patients with acute cholecystitis were retrospectively enrolled and their medical records were reviewed. They were all classified according to therapeutic modality, including early cholecystectomy and antibiotic treatment with or without percutaneous cholecystostomy. The impact of the Tokyo guidelines and the presence of comorbidities on clinical outcome were assessed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. According to Tokyo severity grading, 48 patients were Grade I, 31 patients were Grade II, and 24 patients were Grade III. The Grade III patients had a longer hospital stay than Grade II and Grade I patients (15.2 days, 9.2 days, and 7.3 days, respectively, p < 0.05). According to multivariate analysis, patients with Grade III Tokyo severity, higher Charlson's Comorbidity Score, and encountering complications had a longer hospital stay. Based on treatment modality, surgeons selected the patients with less severity and fewer comorbidities for cholecystectomy, and these patients had a shorter hospital stay. In addition to the grading of the Tokyo guidelines, comorbidities had an additional impact on clinical outcomes and should be an important consideration when making therapeutic decisions.
急性胆囊炎的治疗仍基于临床专业知识。本研究旨在调查急性胆囊炎的预后是否与东京指南的严重程度标准及其他临床合并症相关。共回顾性纳入103例急性胆囊炎患者并审查其病历。根据治疗方式对他们进行分类,包括早期胆囊切除术以及有或无经皮胆囊造瘘术的抗生素治疗。通过单因素和多因素回归分析评估东京指南和合并症的存在对临床结局的影响。根据东京严重程度分级,48例患者为I级,31例患者为II级,24例患者为III级。III级患者的住院时间长于II级和I级患者(分别为15.2天、9.2天和7.3天,p<0.05)。多因素分析显示,东京严重程度为III级、Charlson合并症评分较高以及发生并发症的患者住院时间较长。基于治疗方式,外科医生选择病情较轻和合并症较少的患者进行胆囊切除术,这些患者的住院时间较短。除了东京指南的分级外,合并症对临床结局有额外影响,在做出治疗决策时应作为重要考虑因素。