de Haan Sanneke, Rietveld Erik, Denys Damiaan
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mod Trends Pharmacopsychiatry. 2013;29:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000351929. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
In this chapter, we give an overview of current and historical conceptions of the nature of obsessions and compulsions. We discuss some open questions pertaining to the primacy of the affective, volitional or affective nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Furthermore, we add some phenomenological suggestions of our own. In particular, we point to the patients' need for absolute certainty and the lack of trust underlying this need. Building on insights from Wittgenstein, we argue that the kind of certainty the patients strive for is unattainable in principle via the acquisition of factual knowledge. Moreover, we suggest that the patients' attempts to attain certainty are counter-productive as their excessive conscious control in fact undermines the trust they need.
在本章中,我们概述了关于强迫观念和强迫行为本质的当前及历史概念。我们讨论了一些与强迫症的情感、意志或情感本质的首要性相关的开放性问题。此外,我们还提出了一些自己的现象学建议。特别是,我们指出了患者对绝对确定性的需求以及这种需求背后缺乏信任的问题。基于维特根斯坦的见解,我们认为患者所追求的那种确定性原则上无法通过获取事实知识来实现。此外,我们认为患者为实现确定性所做的尝试适得其反,因为他们过度的有意识控制实际上破坏了他们所需的信任。