Zhen Zhang, Department of Surgery, Mengyin People's Hospital, Shandong Province, 276200, P. R. China.
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(5):1119-22. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.4767.
To compare the clinical efficacy and surgical effects of the anterior low small incision and the traditional incision in the treatments of thyroid adenomas.
Eighty cases of thyroid adenoma patients were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. Forty patients in the control group received the traditional incision, whereas the experimental group received the anterior low small incision treatment. The clinical efficacy and complications were compared between these two groups.
The surgeries were all successfully completed. The surgical blood loss, incision length, length of stay, patient satisfaction and health care costs in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with differences statistically significant (P < 0.05).
The advantages of the anterior low small incision in the treatment of thyroid adenoma patients include smaller incision, lower costs, and fewer complications, when compared with the traditional incision.
比较甲状腺腺瘤患者采用前低位小切口与传统切口治疗的临床疗效和手术效果。
将 80 例甲状腺腺瘤患者随机分为对照组和实验组，每组 40 例。对照组患者采用传统切口，实验组患者采用前低位小切口治疗，比较两组患者的临床疗效和并发症发生情况。
两组手术均顺利完成。实验组患者手术出血量、切口长度、住院时间、患者满意度和保健费用均显著优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
与传统切口相比，前低位小切口治疗甲状腺腺瘤患者的优势在于切口更小、费用更低、并发症更少。
