• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型气囊结肠镜的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Gralnek Ian M, Suissa Alain, Domanov Sveta

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Endoscopy Unit, Elisha Hospital, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2014 Oct;46(10):883-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377968. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1377968
PMID:25225962
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Although colonoscopy is the gold standard for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC), adenomas and cancers are missed. We aimed to establish the safety and feasibility of use of a novel balloon-colonoscope.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (40 - 75 years) referred for CRC screening, polyp surveillance, or diagnostic evaluation were enrolled in a prospective pilot cohort study whose primary endpoint was device safety. Additional endpoints included success of and time to cecal intubation, withdrawal and total procedure times, polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and success of polypectomies.

RESULTS

Among 50 patients (mean age 59.0 years, 27 women [54 %]), three were excluded (inadequate colon preparation, technical problem, abdominal hernia) and 47 were analyzed. Two patients experienced minor adverse events (diarrhea, abdominal pain). Cecal intubation rate was 47 /47 (100 %). Mean times, to reach cecum, withdrawal, and total procedure, were 4.3, 7.4, and 16.5 minutes, respectively. We identified 44 polyps (all successfully removed) in 25 /47 patients (PDR 53.2 %), 35 polyps (79.5 %) were 1 - 5 mm, 4 (9.1 %) 6 - 9 mm, and 5 (11.4 %) ≥ 10 mm. Of 44 polyps, 36 (81.8 %) were "adenomas"; 21/47 patients had ≥ 1 adenoma (ADR 44.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The NaviAid G-EYE balloon-colonoscope appears safe and feasible to use. Comparative human studies are underway.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01749722.

摘要

背景与研究目的

尽管结肠镜检查是检测结直肠癌(CRC)的金标准,但仍会漏诊腺瘤和癌症。我们旨在确定新型球囊结肠镜使用的安全性和可行性。

患者与方法

将因CRC筛查、息肉监测或诊断评估而转诊的40 - 75岁患者纳入一项前瞻性试点队列研究,其主要终点是设备安全性。其他终点包括盲肠插管的成功率和时间、退镜时间和总操作时间、息肉检出率(PDR)、腺瘤检出率(ADR)以及息肉切除术的成功率。

结果

50例患者(平均年龄59.0岁,27例女性[54%])中,3例被排除(结肠准备不充分、技术问题、腹疝),对47例进行了分析。2例患者出现轻微不良事件(腹泻、腹痛)。盲肠插管率为47/47(100%)。到达盲肠、退镜和总操作的平均时间分别为4.3分钟、7.4分钟和16.5分钟。我们在25/47例患者中发现了44个息肉(均成功切除)(PDR为53.2%),35个息肉(79.5%)为1 - 5毫米,4个(9.1%)为6 - 9毫米,5个(11.4%)≥10毫米。在44个息肉中,36个(81.8%)为“腺瘤”;21/47例患者有≥1个腺瘤(ADR为44.7%)。

结论

NaviAid G-EYE球囊结肠镜使用起来似乎安全可行。正在进行比较性人体研究。Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01749722。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study.新型气囊结肠镜的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2014 Oct;46(10):883-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377968. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy.一项前瞻性队列研究,评估了一种具有全谱内镜功能的新型结肠镜检查平台。
Endoscopy. 2013 Sep;45(9):697-702. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344395. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
3
Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.逆行观察设备使用经验对结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率和退镜时间的影响:第三只眼 Retroscope 研究组。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021.
4
Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.用于在结肠镜检查期间改善腺瘤和息肉检测的先进技术。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:40-4. doi: 10.1111/den.12428.
5
A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.一项评估结肠镜退镜时规定患者体位改变对腺瘤检出率影响的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).G-EYE 结肠镜检查在提高腺瘤检出率方面优于标准结肠镜检查:一项国际随机对照试验(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.028. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
7
Feasibility of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide angle of view: a clinical study.新型广角结肠镜的可行性:一项临床研究。
Endoscopy. 2015 May;47(5):444-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390870. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Pancolonic Retroflexed Viewing Using a Short-turn Radius Colonoscope.短半径结肠镜行全结肠倒镜检查的安全性、可行性和有效性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):731-736. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001230.
9
Feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of the Extra Wide Angle View (EWAVE) colonoscope for the detection of colorectal lesions.经额外广角视野(EWAVE)结肠镜检查诊断结直肠病变的可行性、安全性和诊断率。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jan;50(1):63-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120666. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.新型内套辅助结肠镜检查显著提高息肉检出率:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):413-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel colonoscope with an extra-wide field of view increases polyp detection rate compared with standard colonoscope: Prospective model-based trial.与标准结肠镜相比,一种具有超宽视野的新型结肠镜可提高息肉检出率:基于模型的前瞻性试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Oct 28;12(10):E1230-E1236. doi: 10.1055/a-2422-9502. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Retrospective comparison of G-EYE balloon-colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy for increased adenoma detection rate and reduced polyp removal time.G-EYE气囊结肠镜与标准结肠镜在提高腺瘤检出率和缩短息肉切除时间方面的回顾性比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Oct 6;11(9):E920-E927. doi: 10.1055/a-2005-6934. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查期间大肠病变的检测。
DEN Open. 2021 Nov 2;2(1):e68. doi: 10.1002/deo2.68. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.用于大肠息肉检测与分类的内窥镜检查进展
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Dec 18;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1686327. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.优化结肠镜筛查:策略与替代方案
Visc Med. 2019 Aug;35(4):215-225. doi: 10.1159/000501835. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
No Interval Cancers in Endoscopic Practice.内镜检查实践中无间隔期癌。
Curr Health Sci J. 2019 Jan-Mar;45(1):5-18. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.01.01. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
7
Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?技术能否提高腺瘤检出率?
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 10;11:1756283X17746311. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17746311. eCollection 2018.
8
New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.新型内窥镜及附加装置以提高结肠镜检查性能。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 7;23(21):3784-3796. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3784.
9
British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum.英国胃肠病学会关于结肠和直肠锯齿状息肉的立场声明。
Gut. 2017 Jul;66(7):1181-1196. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314005. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy-A Novel Accessory in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate: A Review of the Literature.Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查——提高腺瘤检出率的新型附件:文献综述
Clin Endosc. 2016 Nov;49(6):533-538. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.032. Epub 2016 May 2.