Willhite Calvin C, Karyakina Nataliya A, Yokel Robert A, Yenugadhati Nagarajkumar, Wisniewski Thomas M, Arnold Ian M F, Momoli Franco, Krewski Daniel
Risk Sciences International , Ottawa, ON , Canada.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 Oct;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1-80. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.934439.
Abstract Aluminum (Al) is a ubiquitous substance encountered both naturally (as the third most abundant element) and intentionally (used in water, foods, pharmaceuticals, and vaccines); it is also present in ambient and occupational airborne particulates. Existing data underscore the importance of Al physical and chemical forms in relation to its uptake, accumulation, and systemic bioavailability. The present review represents a systematic examination of the peer-reviewed literature on the adverse health effects of Al materials published since a previous critical evaluation compiled by Krewski et al. (2007) . Challenges encountered in carrying out the present review reflected the experimental use of different physical and chemical Al forms, different routes of administration, and different target organs in relation to the magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure. Wide variations in diet can result in Al intakes that are often higher than the World Health Organization provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), which is based on studies with Al citrate. Comparing daily dietary Al exposures on the basis of "total Al"assumes that gastrointestinal bioavailability for all dietary Al forms is equivalent to that for Al citrate, an approach that requires validation. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for identical Al substances vary as much as 15-fold. The toxicity of different Al forms depends in large measure on their physical behavior and relative solubility in water. The toxicity of soluble Al forms depends upon the delivered dose of Al(+3) to target tissues. Trivalent Al reacts with water to produce bidentate superoxide coordination spheres [Al(O2)(H2O4)(+2) and Al(H2O)6 (+3)] that after complexation with O2(•-), generate Al superoxides Al(O2(•))](+2). Semireduced AlO2(•) radicals deplete mitochondrial Fe and promote generation of H2O2, O2 (•-) and OH(•). Thus, it is the Al(+3)-induced formation of oxygen radicals that accounts for the oxidative damage that leads to intrinsic apoptosis. In contrast, the toxicity of the insoluble Al oxides depends primarily on their behavior as particulates. Aluminum has been held responsible for human morbidity and mortality, but there is no consistent and convincing evidence to associate the Al found in food and drinking water at the doses and chemical forms presently consumed by people living in North America and Western Europe with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neither is there clear evidence to show use of Al-containing underarm antiperspirants or cosmetics increases the risk of AD or breast cancer. Metallic Al, its oxides, and common Al salts have not been shown to be either genotoxic or carcinogenic. Aluminum exposures during neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) can impair bone mineralization and delay neurological development. Adverse effects to vaccines with Al adjuvants have occurred; however, recent controlled trials found that the immunologic response to certain vaccines with Al adjuvants was no greater, and in some cases less than, that after identical vaccination without Al adjuvants. The scientific literature on the adverse health effects of Al is extensive. Health risk assessments for Al must take into account individual co-factors (e.g., age, renal function, diet, gastric pH). Conclusions from the current review point to the need for refinement of the PTWI, reduction of Al contamination in PN solutions, justification for routine addition of Al to vaccines, and harmonization of OELs for Al substances.
摘要 铝(Al)是一种普遍存在的物质,既存在于自然界(作为含量第三丰富的元素),也被人为使用(用于水、食品、药品和疫苗中);它还存在于环境和职业空气传播颗粒物中。现有数据强调了铝的物理和化学形态在其吸收、积累和全身生物利用度方面的重要性。本综述对自Krewski等人(2007年)进行的上一次关键评估以来发表的关于铝材料对健康有害影响的同行评审文献进行了系统审查。进行本综述时遇到的挑战反映了在实验中使用了不同物理和化学形态的铝、不同的给药途径以及与暴露的程度、频率和持续时间相关的不同靶器官。饮食的广泛差异可能导致铝的摄入量往往高于世界卫生组织基于柠檬酸铝研究得出的暂定每周耐受摄入量(PTWI)。基于“总铝”比较每日膳食铝暴露量,假定所有膳食铝形态的胃肠道生物利用度等同于柠檬酸铝的生物利用度,这种方法需要验证。目前相同铝物质的职业接触限值(OELs)相差高达15倍。不同铝形态的毒性在很大程度上取决于它们的物理行为和在水中的相对溶解度。可溶性铝形态的毒性取决于输送到靶组织的Al(+3)剂量。三价铝与水反应生成双齿超氧化物配位球[Al(O2)(H2O4)(+2)和Al(H2O)6(+3)],与O2(•-)络合后,生成铝超氧化物Al(O2(•))](+2)。半还原的AlO2(•)自由基消耗线粒体铁并促进H2O2、O2(•-)和OH(•)的生成。因此,正是Al(+3)诱导的氧自由基形成导致了氧化损伤,进而引发内在凋亡。相比之下,不溶性氧化铝的毒性主要取决于它们作为颗粒物的行为。铝一直被认为与人类发病和死亡有关,但没有一致且令人信服的证据表明,北美和西欧居民目前摄入的剂量和化学形态的食品和饮用水中的铝会增加患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险。也没有明确证据表明使用含铝的腋下止汗剂或化妆品会增加患AD或乳腺癌的风险。金属铝及其氧化物和常见铝盐尚未被证明具有遗传毒性或致癌性。新生儿和儿科肠外营养(PN)期间的铝暴露会损害骨矿化并延迟神经发育。含铝佐剂的疫苗出现了不良反应;然而,最近的对照试验发现,某些含铝佐剂疫苗的免疫反应并不比相同疫苗无铝佐剂时更强,在某些情况下甚至更低。关于铝对健康有害影响的科学文献很广泛。铝的健康风险评估必须考虑个体共同因素(如年龄、肾功能、饮食、胃pH值)。本次综述的结论表明,需要完善PTWI、减少PN溶液中的铝污染、为疫苗中常规添加铝提供理由以及统一铝物质的OELs。